Tuesday, 18 Dec 2018

You are here

Best of 2017: Are ANA Tests Unreliable?

Pisetsky and colleagues have reported in the Annals of Rheumatic Disease that ANA tests done on established SLE patients may yield surprisingly disparate results.

While ANA negative lupus was a problem of old assays and the loss of ANA positivity may be seen with chronicity or age, most rheumatologists believe that ANA positivity is an absolute requirement for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Researchers studied 103 patients with established SLE using three different immunofluorescence assays (IFA) for ANA determination. ANA determinations were also performed by an ELISA and bead-based multiplex assay.

With the IFA kits, ANA negativity was found in 4.9%–22.3% of serum samples. Moreover, the ELISA and multiplex assays found 11.7 to 13.6% seronegativity as well.

Patients with positive assays were more likely to have historic anti–double-stranded DNA positivity and low complement levels.

These findings raise numerous questions including whether these 5-22% of ANA seronegative lupus patients should be considered for clinical trials or managed differently.

Might these findings parallel that seen in rheumatoid arthritis with seronegative and seropositive populations?  While the overlap in treatment and outcomes is considerable, seropositivity (especially for ACPA) has the advantage of homogenizing the population under study.

 

Disclosures: 
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject

Add new comment

More Like This

Genetic Diagnosis for Previously Undiagnosed Disorders

The NEJM has reported the NIH's Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) study results of genetically identifying new diseases from prospectively followed persons with undiagnosed disorders. The UDN was formed in 2014 as a network of seven clinical sites, two sequencing cores, a coordinating center, central biorepository, a metabolomics core, and a model organisms screening center. It was established to apply a multidisciplinary model in the evaluation of the most challenging cases and to identify the biologic characteristics of newly discovered diseases.

SLE and Risk of Malignancy

The risk for cancer in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients has been inconsistently studied.  A new metanalysis shows that SLE has an increased risk for 16 specific cancers and decreased risk for prostate cancer and cutaneous melanoma. 

The Benefits of a Lupus Clinic

A comparative cohort study assessing the quality of care in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) suggests that a dedicated lupus clinic has better quality measure performance compared to lupus management in a general rheumatology clinic.

A study from Rush University enrolled 150 consecutive SLE patients - with 73 followed in the general rheumatology clinic and 77 followed in a dedicated lupus clinic. 

Diagnosing Early Lupus from Mimics

A multicenter study of early systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients examined manifestations at disease onset and found that certain clinical features can help to distinguish early SLE from other SLE‐mimicking conditions. 

High CV Risk in Lupus

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remain at risk for accelerated atherosclerosis, and important questions have yet to be answered, British investigators reported.