Friday, 19 Oct 2018

You are here

Methotrexate Update

I was delighted to see that investigators presenting work at EULAR 2018 haven’t lost interest in our old friend methotrexate, with a number of abstracts examining issues of safety, dose and route of administration.

Low incidence of methotrexate induced liver abnormalities

Most rheumatologists are very comfortable using methotrexate, but many of our patients have concerns about side effects – especially where liver toxicity is concerned. Research presented by a group from Reading, UK (Abstract SAT0215) should go a long way to help us to reassure them.  The group monitored liver function tests in 1964 rheumatology patients over the course of 13 months. The patient cohort included a mix of patients with RA, PsA, and AS) of whom 775 were taking one concomitant DMARD, 82 were on triple therapy and 396 on a biologic alongside their methotrexate. 

Whereas 2.4% of patients developed an elevated ALT (35-100U/l), only 0.51% (10 patients) developed an ALT >100 U/l. Abnormalities were persistent in 8 of these patients but only resulted in one patient in the cohort discontinuing their methotrexate. Although the reported incidence of ALT abnormalities is a bit lower than that in the published literature (some data on doses of methotrexate used in the cohort would also have been useful) this is good news and echoes  the feeling amongst most rheumatologists that this drug is mostly safe where the liver is concerned The authors also suggest that based on this data, that the current BSR guidelines (which suggest monitoring each 3 months on patients on stable doses of methotrexate) are appropriate.

SC safer than Oral Methotrexate

Most rheumatologists are increasingly comfortable with the use of injectable methotrexate. It certainly appears to be better absorbed and more effective than oral methotrexate a group of researchers from the UK propose that it may be safer too (Abstract SAT0235). Using an online safety monitoring tool, FBC and LFT results were monitored from 8394 patients since 

Whereas the mean dose of MTX used in those on sc dosing was higher (21mg vs 17mg, range 5-40mg) the difference in incidence of LFT abnormalities (ALT > 80 U/l) between the two groups was not statistically significant. Patients on injectable methotrexate however (151/949) were less likely to develop neutropenia than those on oral methotrexate (491/2093) (p <0.00001 sc vs oral). Whereas the liver toxicity data is a little underwhelming, sc methotrexate may well be safer where neutropenias are concerned.

The online monitoring tool used in the study, TA Monitor, was developed by a rheumatologist (http://www.therapyaudit.com/tamonitor/) and allows web based monitoring of adverse events to medications like methotrexate. Another thing that caught my eye in that study as the dose range (up to 40mg) of Methotrexate used.

50mg of sc Methotrexate appears well tolerated

A group of Italian and US researchers have been evaluating the tolerability and safety of higher does of sc Methotrexate in RA (Abstract SAT0228). Their study protocol was an open labelled pilot study of 12 weeks duration, where 9 patients with RA were treated initially with a dose of 50mg of sc methotrexate for 4 weeks, followed by 25mg weekly for 4 weeks and the 15mg weekly for 4 weeks. Overall these higher doses were well tolerated with only AE’s occurring in 4 patients, none of which were severe. One patient developed an ALT (<2 ULN) which resolved spontaneously (the same patient also developed vertigo and subsequently withdrew). One patient developed a UTI, another short lived low back pain which resolved, and one patient developed fatigue. 

Although the numbers are small and study duration short, it will be interesting to see if this regimen proves more effective than traditionally used methotrexate doses in RA.

Add new comment

More Like This

Update on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicity

JAMA has a 2018 update/review of the safety issues seen with mmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) - important new cancer therapies, with 14 cancer indications, that have significantly improved survival in several. ICIs are monoclonal antibodies that block inhibitors of T-cell activation and function.

New BSR Guidelines on Biologic Safe Use with Inflammatory Arthritis

The British Society of Rheumatology has produced a set of NICE accredited guidelines for the use of biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

It addresses safety recommendations for all biologic therapies approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) up to June 2016, for use in all inflammatory arthritides [RA, PsA and axial SpA (SpA) including AS].

The Safety of Paternal Exposure to DMARDs and Biologics

Pregnancy and drug safety is a complex issue, often with limited informatoin about maternal drug exposure on the offspring. Greater uncertainty exists when considering whether paternal exposure may also influence fetal outcomes.

A systematic review examined the effect of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on male fertility and if peri-conception (within 3 months) paternal exposure was detrimental to fetal outcomes.

2018-2019 ACIP Recommendations for Seasonal Influenza Vaccination

The current issue of the CDC's MMWR reviews the new seasonal recommendations for vaccination against influenza. This is an update to the previous recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). 

Health Secretary Azar Eyes Rebate Reform

Reuters reports that the U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar had declared his agency has the authority to eliminate rebates on prescription drug purchases, a key element in the administration’s plan to lower prescription medicine costs.

Azar has said rebates created a perverse incentive to continuously raise drug prices.