Friday, 19 Oct 2018

You are here

Ties to Pharma Influences Clinical Trial Results

A study published in The BMJ shows that financial ties between researchers and companies that make the drugs they are studying are independently associated with positive trial results; thereby questioning the bias in these objective trials. (Citation source: http://buff.ly/2jUnA3q)

Relationships with industry are common among investigators of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) - raising concerns about the effect that financial ties may have on the evidence base. But studies investigating these relationships have been conflicting.

US researchers studied this association by examining a random sample of 195 drug trials published in 2013.

They focused on trials that examined the effectiveness of drugs, because these studies have a high impact on both clinical practice and healthcare costs.

More than half (58%) of principal investigators had financial ties to the drug industry - of 397 principal investigators, 231 (58%) had financial ties, 156 (39%) reported advisor/consultancy payments, 81 (20%) reported speakers’ fees, 81 (20%) reported unspecified financial ties, 52 (13%) reported honorariums, 52 (13%) reported employee relationships, 52 (13%) reported travel fees, 41 (10%) reported stock ownership, and 20 (5%) reported having a patent related to the study drug.

 The results show that trials authored by principal investigators with financial ties to drug manufacturers were more likely than other trials to report favourable results. The prevalence of financial ties of principal investigators was 76% among positive studies and 49% among negative studies.

Thus the presence of a financial tie was associated with a greater than 3 fold odds of positive study outcome 

The authors point to possible mechanisms linking industry funding, financial ties, and trial results such as bias by selective outcome reporting, lack of publication, and inappropriate analyses.  They suggested that  trials with industry funding or authors with financial ties should be interpreted with caution until all relevant information is fully disclosed.

 

Disclosures: 
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject

Add new comment

More Like This

NEJM Debate on Medical Marijuana for Chronic Pain

This week’s NEJM features a case discussion and debate over whether medical marijuana should be used to treat chronic pain. The debate focuses on a 31-year-old woman with long-standing complex regional pain syndrome in her leg and foot. CRPS followed a sports related hairline fracture in the right fibula. Her pain has been intractable since.

Hip and Knee Replacements Monitored by Smart Watch

Reuters reports that patients with hip or knee replacements will now be followed for progress using their Apple watches.

A multi-site study involving medical facilities from Massachusetts, California, Colorado and Michigan will receive stats including heart rate, steps taken and standing hours from patients waiting for or recovering from hip and knee replacement surgery.

NSAIDs OK for Certain High-Risk Groups?

Some patients typically contraindicated for prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use may be able to take them with no increased risk of harm, according to a large observational study.

Physical Therapy Equals Arthroscopic Surgery in Meniscal Tears

Several new trials suggest that conservative management may be as efficacious as arthroscopic surgery in patients with meniscal tears, thus contributing to the trend of fewer arthroscopic surgeries. A new trial of patients with nonobstructive meniscal tears shows no significant difference in 2 year outcomes between physical therapy and early arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

Activity Trackers May be Helpful in Arthritis Patients

Use of wearable activity trackers was associated with increases in the number of daily steps among individuals with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disorders, a meta-analysis found.