Skip to main content

Drug Safety

      Recently the FDA approved deucravacitinib (DEUC), a highly selective TYK2 inhibitor for psoriasis. Trials are positive in psoriatic arthritis and a phase II study in systemic lupus erythematosus.…
      RT @KDAO2011: Study of IV tocilizumab for GCA that led to FDA approval of intravenous TCZ this year (2/2022) -one of Dr
      2 years ago
      Study of IV tocilizumab for GCA that led to FDA approval of intravenous TCZ this year (2/2022) -one of Dr. C Langford's pick for #YearinReview @rheumnow #ACR22 https://t.co/luxDDluddM
      RT @Janetbirdope: Is it the medication or behaviour that increases mortality? #SLICC grp showed in #SLE severe non-adher
      2 years ago
      Is it the medication or behaviour that increases mortality? #SLICC grp showed in #SLE severe non-adherence to #HCQ in Yr 1 of #lupus = 3 poor outcomes -more 1 flares, 2 damage, 3 5yr-death. Surrogate of other poor health behaviours and/or HCQ? abst#0343 #ACR22 #ACRBest @RheumNow https://t.co/tTRdyti0sf
      RT @ericdeinmd: Ab0343. #ACR22 Severe non-adherence of HCQ associated with FLARES, DAMAGE and DEATH

      7.3% had "severe no
      2 years ago
      Ab0343. #ACR22 Severe non-adherence of HCQ associated with FLARES, DAMAGE and DEATH 7.3% had "severe non-adherence" by HCQ levels Hazard ratio of flare 3.3, damage 4.26, and death 5.4 Not surprising, but very useful for pt discussion Checking HCQ levels are helpful! @Rheumnow https://t.co/S7P9oTPRGJ
      RT @ericdeinmd: Ab0344 #ACR22
      CKD2+ a/w incr HCQ levels by 149 ng/mL vs CKD1
      400 mg/d dose: incr HCQ levels by 448 ng/mL
      2 years ago
      Ab0344 #ACR22 CKD2+ a/w incr HCQ levels by 149 ng/mL vs CKD1 400 mg/d dose: incr HCQ levels by 448 ng/mL vs 200 Incr body wt by 15 kg -> decr HCQ levels by 82 ng/mL Social determinants didn't effect data >750ng/mL and >1000 predicted of 75% decr flare risk @Rheumnow #ACRBest https://t.co/p21rqnO4ym
      RT @KDAO2011: Dr. C Langford on #YearinReview: ORAL Surveillance noted NNH=16 in pts w/ASCVD compared to NNH 223 in pts
      2 years ago
      Dr. C Langford on #YearinReview: ORAL Surveillance noted NNH=16 in pts w/ASCVD compared to NNH 223 in pts w/o ASCVD. This led to FDA warning on all JAKi; how does not this apply to the new JAKi's? Discussion needed with patients when starting this class of drug #ACR22 @rheumnow https://t.co/XtJVap6yjh
      RT @ericdeinmd: Year in Review #acr22
      Oral Surveillance:
      With ASCVD number needed to harm 16, only 223 without ASCVD
      Foc
      2 years ago
      Year in Review #acr22 Oral Surveillance: With ASCVD number needed to harm 16, only 223 without ASCVD Focus on risk stratification ⁦@RheumNow⁩ https://t.co/tJyha1WKfR
      RT @JulianSegan: ORAL surveillance the big talking factor over the last year.

      NNH of 16(!) for CV event (over 5 yrs) in
      ORAL surveillance the big talking factor over the last year. NNH of 16(!) for CV event (over 5 yrs) in those with history of atherosclerotic CV disease. @RheumNow #ACR22 #yearinreview #ACRBest
      RT @doctorRBC: Great start to year in review.
      Beginning with JAKinibs in the much talked about ORAL Surveillance study.
      Great start to year in review. Beginning with JAKinibs in the much talked about ORAL Surveillance study. Good Review of the mechanisms of action for JAKinibs @RheumNow #ACR22 https://t.co/IF0t4uSefj
      RT @AkhilSoodMD: Abstr #0078
      Ogdie et al found that
      - Pts seen by rheumatologists more likely receive bDMARDs or csDMARD
      Abstr #0078 Ogdie et al found that - Pts seen by rheumatologists more likely receive bDMARDs or csDMARDs - Opiates & non-Opiate pain medications were more commonly prescribed to pts seen by PCPs alone @RheumNow #ACR22 https://t.co/uDcOc0Nn3Y https://t.co/FeAq21fiVs