Friday, 21 Feb 2020

You are here

Best of 2019 - Ups and Downs with Abatacept

Two recent studies have examined the effect of starting abatacept upon the risk of serious hospitalized infections or cancer, showing divergent results from claims data analyses.

Chen and colleagues reported in Arthritis Care & Research on a propensity score-matched cohort study analyzing 11,248 matched RA patients starting abatacept or TNFi and followed until their first event.  The primary outcome was that of hospitalized (serious) infection.

Hospitalized infection was observed 37 SIE ABA treated patients compared to an event rate of 47 SIE in TNFi treated patients (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.64-0.95).  Amongst all hospitalizable infections, the ABA associated risk was primarily significant for pulmonary related infections.

Thus, the initial use of ABA was associated with a 22% less risk for hospitalzed infections when compared to those who initiated a TNFi. The signficance was largely against those who initiated infliximab and was not significantly different when compared to those initiating etanercept or adalimumab.

In another study published in Rheumatology, Montastruc et al. assessed the risk of cancer when choosing abatacept or other biological DMARDs (bDMARD) as the initial biologic in treating RA. They also used a US commercial claims dataset with supplemental US Medicare data 2007 to 2014. (Citation source: https://buff.ly/2TCFg1b)

The  comparison included cohorts of 4328 ABA patients and 59,860 on other bDMARDs. The incidence rates for any cancer were:

  • ABA: 4.76 per 100 per year
  • bDMARDs: 3.41 per 100 per year

Abatacept had a small but significant increased risk of all cancer (aHR 1.17; 95% CI 1.06, 1.30).  These results were largely driven by a significantly increased incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer (aHR 1.20; 95% CI 1.03, 1.39).

The risk of other specific cancer sites were not significant between groups.

These findings have limitations and will need to be studied and replicated in other populations to be clinically meaningful.  

Disclosures: 
The author has received compensation as an advisor or consultant on this subject

Add new comment

More Like This

Tofacitinib Effective in Refractory Still's Disease

Fourteen cases reported from mainland China suggest that tofacitinib (TOFA) may be effective in patients with refractory adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD), further adding to a growing list of potential use of JAK inhibition in managing inflammatory, and now autoinflammatory, disease.

QD Clinic - Hepatitis B and Biologics

QD Clinic - Lessons from the clinic Active HBV infection (HGsAg+) on anti-viral therapy but needs a biologic - what should you use?

Biosimilars for Rheum Disease: Failure to Launch

The availability of biologic biosimilars has thus far had negligible impact on prescribing practices in the United States, in stark contrast to what has been observed in some European countries, researchers reported.

Best of 2019 - Is Methotrexate Necessary with Tofacitinib?

Rheumatoid arthritis patients taking tofacitinib (Xeljanz) plus methotrexate who achieved low disease activity (LDA) may be able to withdraw from the latter agent without significant worsening of disease activity, a researcher reported at EULAR 2019 in Madrid.

Best of 2019 - Are Non-TNF Biologics Superior to TNF inhibitors?

Current ACR and EULAR guidelines list TNF-inhibitors (TNFi) abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab as being equally effective after methotrexate or as second line therapies when treating rheumatoid arthritis. An analysis from the Swedish Rheumatology Register shows that the non-TNFi biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), in particular tocilizumab and rituximab, are more effective than TNFi.