Friday, 16 Nov 2018

You are here

Cardiovascular Events: Allopurinol vs. Febuxostat

In the registration trials for febuxostat there were concerns about a cardiovascular (CV) safety signal. In studies of the effect of allopurinol on CV risk/events allopurinol has found to be protective so whether febuxostat is different is a point to clarify. So this study by MaryAnn Zhang and co-authors from Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Boston University, Boston and The Seoul National University in Korea is an important piece of work to contribute to building a picture of the CV safety of febuxostat.

The authors used five years of US Medicare claims data to complete a cohort study of gout patients over 65 years who started on allopurinol or febuxostat. They included 24,900 febuxostat starters with 74,700 who started on allopurinol, a 1:3 match using propensity scoring. Propensity score matching is a method to try and match people for similar characteristics to reduce bias in studies.

They followed people for just over a year and found no difference in hazard ratios (HR) for the primary end point of myocardial infarction or stroke (HR 1.03, 0.95-1.10) and all secondary endpoints of MI, stroke, coronary revascularisation, new onset heart failure or exacerbation of pre-existing heart failure.

So the take home from this study of almost 100,000 people is that while there was a safety signal in the original registration trials for febuxostat this study in a real world setting hasn’t replicated that.

Add new comment

More Like This

Musculoskeletal Events with Statin Use

Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System data examined the association between statins' musculoskeletal adverse events (MAEs).

Review of the data shows that atorvastatin and rosuvastatin (with strong low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol‐lowering effects) had a higher risk and a faster onset of MAEs when compared with simvastatin.

They could not detect whether concomitant drugs shifted the onset timing of MAEs. 

Low Short-Term Risks of NSAIDs in High Risk Patients

JAMA has published a large Canadian claims-based study showing that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use in patients with hypertension, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease was not associated with a significant safety risk - but this only looked at short-term outcomes (7-37 days of exposure). 

Update on Checkpoint Inhibitor Safety

“Autoimmunity is the Achilles heel of onco-immunotherapy” per Dr. Leonard Calabrese, which leaves a dilemma for rheumatologists. Onco-immunotherapy induces immune dysregulation to allow patients to develop an immune response to their cancer cells. An unfortunate side effect for patients taking onco-immunotherapy is often autoimmune-like diseases referred to as immune adverse reactions (irAEs). Studies in France and the United States have shown that irAEs can be a good prognostic sign, suggesting these therapies are working. Rheumatology is faced with new problems as onco-immunotherapies may induce new chronic diseases in multiple different forms secondary to the treatment.

Anti-phospholipid Antibodies and Myocardial Infarction.

The Annals of Internal Medicine features a communique from the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden demonstrating that elevated levels of antiphospholipid antibodies may be found in patients with myocardial infarction without any autoimmune co-morbidity, published in Annals of Internal Medicine reports.

Update on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicity

JAMA has a 2018 update/review of the safety issues seen with mmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) - important new cancer therapies, with 14 cancer indications, that have significantly improved survival in several. ICIs are monoclonal antibodies that block inhibitors of T-cell activation and function.