Wednesday, 21 Nov 2018

You are here

Could Measuring Drug Levels with TNF Treatment Hurt Your Patients?

Our colleagues in gastroenterology measure drug levels with certain biologics used in inflammatory bowel disease in order to increase the dose for optimal benefit if the patient has a low trough level (i.e. targeting drug level).

There have been GI trials with T2T with drug levels but they are not always suggesting that the strategy is superior to usual care. Also, this is really not a common practice in rheumatology.

An interesting study (OP0229) linked patients from the BSRBR (British Biologic Register) on a TNFi who also had serum samples taken to calculate drug levels (N=703). Two thirds had high drugs levels (which is very surprising to me as I suspected it would be far less than that due to non-adherence, spacing treatment when doing well, etc).

Those with a high level had more infections (Hazard Ratio 1.51; 95% CI 1.14-2.01) but the serious infections were not statistically more (HR 1.17; 95% CI 0.58-2.30).

Perhaps drug levels could help us identify if a patient could take less TNFi treatment and possibly reduce the number of infections. However, the study used serum samples collected for other reasons and then for this study performed drug levels so I wonder if many of the levels were not trough levels.

This study did not measure efficacy between the group nor durability of the groups so I can’t comment on any potential differences between the groups with respect to disease state and drug retention. It is something though to think about if we are to personalize medicine – get what you need and not more and not less. 

 

Disclosures: 
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject

Add new comment

More Like This

Musculoskeletal Events with Statin Use

Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System data examined the association between statins' musculoskeletal adverse events (MAEs).

Review of the data shows that atorvastatin and rosuvastatin (with strong low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol‐lowering effects) had a higher risk and a faster onset of MAEs when compared with simvastatin.

They could not detect whether concomitant drugs shifted the onset timing of MAEs. 

Low Short-Term Risks of NSAIDs in High Risk Patients

JAMA has published a large Canadian claims-based study showing that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use in patients with hypertension, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease was not associated with a significant safety risk - but this only looked at short-term outcomes (7-37 days of exposure). 

Update on Checkpoint Inhibitor Safety

“Autoimmunity is the Achilles heel of onco-immunotherapy” per Dr. Leonard Calabrese, which leaves a dilemma for rheumatologists. Onco-immunotherapy induces immune dysregulation to allow patients to develop an immune response to their cancer cells. An unfortunate side effect for patients taking onco-immunotherapy is often autoimmune-like diseases referred to as immune adverse reactions (irAEs). Studies in France and the United States have shown that irAEs can be a good prognostic sign, suggesting these therapies are working. Rheumatology is faced with new problems as onco-immunotherapies may induce new chronic diseases in multiple different forms secondary to the treatment.

Anti-phospholipid Antibodies and Myocardial Infarction.

The Annals of Internal Medicine features a communique from the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden demonstrating that elevated levels of antiphospholipid antibodies may be found in patients with myocardial infarction without any autoimmune co-morbidity, published in Annals of Internal Medicine reports.

Update on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicity

JAMA has a 2018 update/review of the safety issues seen with mmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) - important new cancer therapies, with 14 cancer indications, that have significantly improved survival in several. ICIs are monoclonal antibodies that block inhibitors of T-cell activation and function.