Wednesday, 21 Aug 2019

You are here

CRA Position Statement on Medical Cannabis Use

Courtesy of the Canadian Rheumatology Association (CRA) website, here are consensus guidelines on medical cannabis use.

Rheumatology patients experience prevalent pain that is only modestly controlled with current treatment strategies.

The CRA recognizes the need for improved pain relief in patients with rheumatic diseases. With the legalization of cannabis, Canadians are increasingly turning to their physicians for guidance regarding medical cannabis use, which has already entered mainstream medicine. Medical cannabis has not been subject to the standard review required for drug approval by Health Canada. In the absence of studies examining the effects of medical cannabis in patients with rheumatic diseases, rheumatologists should be prepared to offer pragmatic advice in a caring and empathetic way to ensure harm reduction.

Overarching principles for medical cannabis in rheumatology patients

  1. Medical cannabis is not an alternative to standard care for any rheumatic disease, and rheumatologists should adhere to current treatment standards and guidelines for rheumatic disease management.
  2. There are no published studies of the effects of medical cannabis in patients with rheumatic diseases and the few studies examining cannabinoid pharmaceutical products report limited benefits and high risk of adverse events.
  3. Medical cannabis should not be used in rheumatology patients under the age of 25 years.
  4. It is acknowledged that rheumatic disease patients may seek advice regarding use of medical cannabis, may currently be self-medicating with cannabis or may request a prescription for medical cannabis.
  5. Common reasons that patients may consider use of medical cannabis are for pain relief, improvement in mood and/or sleep promotion.
  6. Current treatment strategies for pain relief and sleep promotion, including non-pharmacologic treatments must be tried before consideration of trial of medical cannabis.
  7. Medical cannabis may provide symptom relief for some patients with rheumatic diseases.
  8. Short term adverse events (including immediate psychomotor effects, dizziness, appetite changes, effect on mood, and the rare serious side effects of disorientation and psychosis) are high with the use of medical cannabis and are likely to be similar to those reported for other disease populations.
  9. The long-term risks associated with medical cannabis in patients with rheumatic diseases are unknown.
  10. Despite a patient’s understanding of the lack of scientific evidence to support a benefit, and the potential increased risk of harms, some patients may choose a trial of medical cannabis over other options.
  11. Rheumatologists must endeavor to maintain an empathetic therapeutic relationship with their patients, avoid personal biases, and ensure harm reduction for both patients and society.

Table 1. Contraindications and cautions for medical cannabis use

1. Medical cannabis should not be used in the following patient populations:

a. Rheumatology patients under the age of 25 years

b. Patients with allergic reactions to cannabinoid products

c. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

d. Patients with a history of current or past psychotic illness, substance abuse disorder, previous suicide attempts or suicidal ideation

2. Medical cannabis should be used with caution in the following patient populations:

a. Elderly patients

b. Patients with unstable mental health disease

c. Patients with a history of current moderate or severe cardiovascular or pulmonary disease

d. Patients working in settings requiring high levels of concentration, optimal executive functioning and alertness

e. Patients receiving concomitant therapy with sedative-hypnotics or other psychoactive drugs

Table 2. When considering a trial of medical cannabis, the following should be addressed by the prescribing physician:

1. The physician must have a full clinical knowledge of the patient including a clinical and psychosocial history, diagnosis of rheumatic disease, co-morbid medical and mental health diseases, reasons for considering medical cannabis, and concomitant medications.

2. Treatment goals should be clearly discussed.

3. Patients should be informed about the known adverse effects of cannabis, which include acute psychomotor impairment, potential lung injury when smoked, and addiction risk.

4. Cannabis should not be smoked due to the toxic products of combustion. Inhalation via vaporizer or oral consumption is the preferred route of administration.

5. Medical cannabis should be obtained from a licensed producer with known molecular content.

6. Cannabis with a lower THC and higher CBD content is preferable.

7. The ideal dosing schedule is not known but treatment should start with a nighttime dose and may be slowly increased to a maximum of 3 grams of medical cannabis (dried product or equivalent) a day.

8. Patients should be followed within 4-8 weeks after initiating cannabis treatment.

9. Cannabis treatment should be discontinued if there is absence of appreciable clinical effect or side effects that are substantial.

10. Those continuing treatment should be evaluated at least every 3 months to assess efficacy and need to continue treatment.

Disclosures: 
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject

Add new comment

More Like This

Vitamin D Supplements Fail to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes - DUH!

A NEJM report shows that the use of vitamin D3 supplementation (4000 IU per day) in those without diabetes or vitamin D deficiency failed to significantly lower risk of type 2 diabetes (compared to placebo).

The rational for this report included observational data showing an association between a low blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and the risk of type 2 diabetes.

Risk of Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding With New vs Conventional Oral Anticoagulants

The comparative risk for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) was compared to vitamin K antagonists or anti-platelet agents in a recent metanalysis, which showed no significant difference in major GIB events between these agents.

Rituximab Superior to Cyclosporine for Membranous Nephropathy

The NEJM has reported that rituximab (RTX) and cyclosporine (CYA) was noninferior to cyclosporine in inducing complete or partial remission of proteinuria at 12 months and was superior in maintaining proteinuria remission up to 24 months. 

Management of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) in Adults

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a severe hyperinflammatory syndrome induced by activated macrophages and cytotoxic T cells.  HLH manifests recurrent fever, cytopenia, liver dysfunction, and a sepsis-like syndrome that may complicated by multiple organ failure.

More Trouble for Mallinckrodt’s Acthar Gel

Reuters has reported that Mallinckrodt Plc has tentatively agreed to pay $15.4 million to resolve a US Justice Department investigation into company promotional practices for Acthar gel.