Thursday, 16 Aug 2018

You are here

Defining Refractory RA by Biologic Use

A study from the  British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) has shown that biologic refractory disease is seen in at least 6% of patients who have ever received a biologic DMARD (bDMARDs).

Their study of 13,502 patients from the registry included RA patients who initially started a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) between 2001 to 2014.  They defined bDMARD refractory patients based on the need to switch to a third class of bDMARD.

They found that 867 of 13 502 (6%) patients were bDMARD refractory and that this took nearly 8 years to get to their third bDMARD class.

Interestingly, 6.7% of those enrolled 2001–2008 were bDMARD refractory disease and took a longer median time (median 8.4 years) to achieve this status compared to more recent enrollees. Of those enrolled between 2011–2014, 4.8% became bDMARD refractory, but in a much shorter time of 2.0 years; suggesting physicians have become more likely to cycle bDMARDs. 

For example, bDMARD refractory patients were remained on their first TNFi for a median of 3.9 years - longer in the earlier cohort compared to the more recent cohort (4.4 years vs 0.8 years, respectively).  Reasons for 1st TNFi discontinuation included ineffectiveness (52%), adverse events (24%), and other reasons (3%) such as injection-related problems or family planning). The reason for stopping the TNFi was not recorded in 21% of patients.

Multivariate analysis showed that bDMARD refractory disease patients were more lkely to be women, younger age, shorter disease duration, higher patient global assessment, higher Health Assessment Questionnaire score, current smokers, obesity and greater social deprivation.

Patterns of biologic use revealed that after the initial TNFi, most changed to a second TNFi (55%), especially in the 2001-2008 cohort (59%), but less so in the modern 2011-2014 cohort where only 19% chose a second TNFi.  The vast majority (83%) of 2nd bDMARD changes went to B cell inhibition (i.e., rituximab).  Third bDMARD changes preferred IL-6 inhibitors (54%) over T cell costimulation inhibitors (24%).  This is observational data. The authors note that these therapeutic choices  largely reflected the order in which these drugs became available in the UK. 

EULAR has developed a ‘difficult-to-treat’ RA task force to study this issue, as there is no accepted definition of bDMARD refractory RA. 

The author has received compensation as an advisor or consultant on this subject

Add new comment

More Like This

Success of Stopping Depends on the Biologic

The type of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) being used and remission duration were important factors predicting whether remission was maintained among patients with rheumatoid arthritis after cessation of the biologic, a Japanese study found.

IL-1 Suppression May Improve Dilated Cardiomyopathy


Interleukin-1 (IL-1) suppression helped reverse symptoms of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) for one patient in a case study that may implicate inflammation in the development of the condition.

IL-23 Inhibitor Fails in Ankylosing Spondylitis

A study of the IL-23 risankizumab in active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients failed to show efficacy and did not meet primary efficacy endpoints in a 6-month trial.

Five Barriers to Biosimilar Adoption in the US

A recent Deloitte analysis of the biosimilar market in the USA suggests there are defined obstacles to biosimilar use that must be dealt with, especially as the current administration is seeking to lower drug prices and reduce out-of-pocket costs for US consumers.

EULAR 2018 - Day 4 Report

The EULAR 2018 wound down on Saturday with fewer oral presentations but many posters.  In my last report I put together a collection of impressions and some thematic highlights not covered in previous reports. Also some of these represent research and reporting trends – some healthy, others not so – that were evident at the EULAR 2018 meeting.