Monday, 18 Feb 2019

You are here

Does Methotrexate Work in Giant Cell Arteritis?

There seems to be both hope and uncertainty regarding the use of weekly methotrexate (MTX) in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients whom need to limit their glucocorticoid use. While well done clinical trials have shown no certain efficacy, data suggesting MTX benefits comes from small trials, anecdotes and clinical experience. 

One of the earliest and best done trials of MTX in GCA was published by Hoffman et al in 2002 enrolled 98 temporal artery biopsy proven (~80%) who were stared on prednisone and MTX 15 mg/week or placebo (PBO).  They found the frequency of treatment failure (relapses) to be comparable after 12 months: 57.5% for MTX  and 77.3% for PBP treated patients (P = 0.26). MTX was therefore, not associated with a reduced risk of treatment failure (relative risk 0.72; 95% CI 0.41-1.28).

Patients diagnosed with GCA from 1998 to 2013 with confirmed evidence of temporal artery biopsy and/or radiographic evidence of large vessel vasculitis were identified. Each patient with GCA treated with adjunct MTX (case) was matched to a similar patient with GCA treated only with GC (control). GC requirements and relapse events before and after MTX initiation (or corresponding index date) were compared using rate ratios (RR).

Another recent "real world" trial* matched 83 GCA MTX + glucocorticoid treated patients against 83 glucorticoid only patients (controls) and the outcomes and flare rates compared. The time from GCA diagnosis to MTX initiation was 39 (13-80) weeks and the median dose was 13.5 (10-15) mg/week.

When they examined future relapse rates before and after MTX initiation, they found significantly reduced rates in both cases (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.24-0.41) and controls (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43-0.86). The decrease in relapse rate was significantly greater in patients taking MTX than in those taking GC alone (p = 0.004). Steroid use and discontinuation did not differ between groups.

From this single-institution observational study, the addition of MTX to GC appeared to decrease the rate of subsequent relapse by nearly 2-fold compared to patients taking GC alone.

* Editors note: always be wary of "real world" data as these are not proof, but only capable of raising interesting postulates that require more rigourous testing or trials.

Disclosures: 
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject

Rheumatologists' Comments

In our center ,Iran research Rheumatology center ,we have prescribed MTX since a long time ago and it is very effective in prednisolone dose reduction

More Like This

No Difference in Oral or IV Antibiotics for Bone & Joint Infections

Research from the NEJM shows that oral antibiotic therapy was noninferior to intravenous antibiotic therapy when used during the first six weeks for complex orthopedic infections.

There is considerable discussion whether complex bone and joint infections must be managed with prolonged intravenous antibiotics or if oral antibiotic therapy may suffice. 

2019: the Year of Price Hikes

In 2019 there have been numerous reports of higher drug pricing for many drugs.  Yesterday it was reported that the price of insulin drugs have more than doubled from 2012 to 2016.

Reuters reports that in the United States, the pricing on more than 250 prescription drugs have gone up.

Price of Drug Promotion Skyrockets

JAMA reports that health care advertising costs in the U.S. have almost doubled over the past two decades, surging from $17.7 billion in 1997 to at least $29.9 billion in 2016. (Citation source: https://buff.ly/2Rk8a9Q)

2018 Rheumatology Year In Review

This annual appraisal of hallmark moments, news and research articles from 2018 are gleaned from that published in RheumNow during the last year and filtered by other news sources and literature review.  The top 10 list herein is rooted in what rheumatologists should know and what will likely change their standards and practice in the future, if not 2019. 

Best of 2018: Advance Practice Clinicians Proliferating in Specialty Practices

An analysis of SK&A outpatient provider files, covering 90% of physician practices in the United States, shows that between 2008 to 2016, there was a 22% increase in the employment of advanced practice clinicians (APCs) by specialty practices.  By 2016, 28% of all specialty practices employed APCs.