Monday, 16 Sep 2019

You are here

Drug Pricing Regulations in US and Canada

Reuters reports on regulatory efforts by Canada and the US to curb the rising cost of drugs, especially expensive new medicines. 

In Canada, a little-known government agency is increasing its oversight of expensive drugs sold in Canada. The federal Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) is targeting an increasing number of expensive drugs introduced in the last several years by drug makers.

This  agency has the authority to review and challenge the price of any such drugs in Canada and may order companies to repay some revenue.  A review of open PMPRB investigations finds that the use of overpriced drugs has more than doubled from 59 in 2013 to 122 as of March 2018.

The PMPRB aims to contain costs to the benefit of private drug plans, provincial governments and out-of-pocket costs for the patients.

Of course the concern is that these practices in Canada may be considered in Washington, as yet another way of controlling drug prices.

Lobbyists for the pharmaceutical industry have suggested that the changes can delay or limit Canadians’ access to new patented medicines.

Reuters reported in February that drug companies offered to give up C$8.6 billion($6.4 billion) in revenue over 10 years to head off the PMPRB reforms. 

Announced in 2017, the rules were scheduled to take effect in January but have been delayed as the government reviews feedback.

A second Reuters report discusses the transparency of drug pricing with the Trump administration plans to require drugmakers to disclose drug prices with direct to consumer advertisements (DTCA) for promoted drugs. (Citation source: https://buff.ly/2H5G76i)

In an effort to lower drugs costs for consumers, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) says that the list price would be disclosed if it is equal to or greater than $35 for a month’s supply.  HHS Secretary Alex Azar said the agency settled on the $35 a month benchmark because that is a common copayment paid by patients filling their monthly prescriptions.

 HHS says that the 10 most commonly advertised drugs range from $488 to $16,938 per month.

This is one of two efforts to reduce prices; a recently proposed rule requires that drug rebates, or discounts, be passed on to Medicare patients when they buy certain drugs.

This advertising rule, which was finalized on Wednesday, will take effect in about 60 days.

 

 

 

 

Disclosures: 
The author has received compensation as an advisor or consultant on this subject

Rheumatologists' Comments

Thanks for sharing Dr Cush.. Like usual, the ones who are responsible for the issues use the argument that are politically correct: "Lobbyists for the pharmaceutical industry have suggested that the changes can delay or limit Canadians’ access to new patented medicines". We all know the bottom hidden agenda. These issues may need to have input and involvement from the main players and sufferers: the doctors and patients, maybe via some sort of voting mechanism

More Like This

Medical Use of Cannabis in 2019

JAMA has published an overview of cannabis and its medical uses. Although nearly 10% of cannabis users in the United States report using it for medicinal purposes, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of medical cannabis for most conditions for which its use is advocated or advised. Nevertheless, there is increase in favoring the public availability of cannabis, largely for the management of more than 50 medical conditions.

Steroid Sparing Effects of Methotrexate and Mycophenolate in Uveitis

Patients with noninfectious uveitis (intermediate, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis) often require high dose corticosteroids and therefore may need steroid-sparing DMARD therapy. The FAST study investigated the corticosteroid-sparing effect of methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil in adults with noninfectious uveitis.

Vitamin D Supplements Fail to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes - DUH!

A NEJM report shows that the use of vitamin D3 supplementation (4000 IU per day) in those without diabetes or vitamin D deficiency failed to significantly lower risk of type 2 diabetes (compared to placebo).

The rational for this report included observational data showing an association between a low blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and the risk of type 2 diabetes.

Risk of Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding With New vs Conventional Oral Anticoagulants

The comparative risk for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) was compared to vitamin K antagonists or anti-platelet agents in a recent metanalysis, which showed no significant difference in major GIB events between these agents.

Rituximab Superior to Cyclosporine for Membranous Nephropathy

The NEJM has reported that rituximab (RTX) and cyclosporine (CYA) was noninferior to cyclosporine in inducing complete or partial remission of proteinuria at 12 months and was superior in maintaining proteinuria remission up to 24 months.