Tuesday, 23 Apr 2019

You are here

Health Economics of SLE

A number of presentations over the past few days have addressed the health economics of SLE.

Clarke et al (abstract 2811) studied the costs associated with damage states in a large Canadian lupus cohort as well as in the SL ICC cohort (abstract 2925).

In the first study, 1361 SLE patients from across Canada were studied and the annual direct and indirect costs of care where assessed for the whole cohort as well as according to the level of damage measured by the SLICC damage index. In this study they found that the cumulative direct costs over a 10-year period increased with levels of damage and the direct costs of care were 4.2 fold higher in those with most damage. Interestingly however, the indirect costs over a 10-year period were quite similar across levels of damage accrued. Importantly however, the indirect costs where almost four-fold higher than the overall direct costs of care for lupus patients.

In the SLICC cohort (abstract 2925) a similar analysis was undertaken in 457 patients from SLICC centres across the globe. The same trend was noted with a 4.3-fold increase in direct costs amongst the group with the highest levels of damage compared to those with no damage. Again, there was a similar level of indirect costs across damage groups, and the indirect cost being approximately 4-fold higher than the direct health care costs. Reasons for these high indirect costs include lost productivity and lost opportunities related to their disease (these were both more important that absenteeism i.e. days lost from work).

Abstract 188 also assessed healthcare costs in a cohort of 200 SLE patients from a single cohort in Australia. This group found that the annual costs were significantly greater in patients with high disease activity and in those who had damage at baseline and in particular patients who had persistent disease activity over follow-up, those with renal disease and those who used glucocorticoids. Meeting criteria for LLDAS (lupus low disease activity state) for more than 50% of the follow-up period was associated with approximately 25% reduction in annual direct medical costs. Similarly,abstract 195 also assessed healthcare utilisation and resource use in 1160 SLE cases identified from the German statutory health insurance database in 2009. Lupus patients had almost twice the total medical costs than matched controls (Euro 6895 versus Euro 3692 P<0.0001). Patients with moderate and severe lupus also had significantly higher healthcare costs in patients with mild disease.

These studies add significant new data to this field. Overall they show that patients with lupus incur much higher direct health care costs than non-lupus patients. The direct costs increase with higher disease activity and with increasing levels of damage. Getting patients into a low disease activity state reduces overall healthcare costs. The data from Clarke’s group however highlights the fact that indirect costs due to for example, lost productivity and lost opportunities for work results in indirect costs associated with lupus being much higher (almost 4-fold higher) than the direct costs. These appear to be less influenced by damage. We therefore need to look more broadly at lupus patients, addressing factors such as fatigue, health-related quality of life and work rehabilitation approaches to address the considerable indirect costs associated with this condition.

Add new comment

More Like This

EULAR 2019 Update to Lupus Management

The goal of SLE treatment is remission or low disease activity and flare prevention. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended in all patients with lupus, at a dose not exceeding 5 mg/kg real body weight. Glucocorticoids (GC) should be minimised to less than 7.5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent). Appropriate initiation of immunomodulatory agents (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) can be tailored to the clinical scenarios and may allow for tapering or discontinuation of GC.

Mortality Risk Factors in Systemic Sclerosis

A French cohort study of 625 systemic sclerosis (SStc) patients has found a significantly increased mortality risk that can be predicted by common clinical variables.

In addition to a multicenter prospective study, investigators performed a metanalysis on SSc standarized mortality ratios (SMR) and hazard ratios of prognosis factors.

Better Tests Ahead in Lupus

The advent of "big data" and "-omics" technologies offers hope that clinicians will soon have better diagnostics for systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatologists here were told.

GCA Relapse Risk High with Steroids

Prior to the introduction of tocilizumab to manage giant cell arteritis (GCA), glucocorticoids (GC) have been the mainstay of therapy, but has been limited by relapses in disease. A recent metanalysis shows that relapses occur in nearly half of patients and are related to the duration of therapy rather than the initial dose of GC.

A literature review found 34 studies (2,505 patients) from 8 RCTs of GCA patients only treated with GC.

Presenting Features of Early SLE

What clinical features best identify early systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients from mimics?  A multicenter, multinational study aimed to evaluate manifestations at disease onset and to compare early SLE manifestations to those of diseases mimicking SLE.