Thursday, 20 Feb 2020

You are here

Low Serious Infection Risk with Newer Agents in Psoriasis

JAMA Dermatology reports on a comparative cohort study of 107,707 psoriasis patients, finding a decreased risk of serious infections among users of apremilast, etanercept, and ustekinumab when compared with methotrexate.

Claims-\based, observational cohort study from 2 large US health insurance databases (Optum and MarketScan; 2003-2015) examined psoriasis patients who were new users of systemic medications for psoriasis. Pairwise propensity score matching was used to adjust for potential confounders.

Two different commercial claims datasets included 31,595 and 76,112 psoriasis patients who were new users of acitretin, adalimumab, apremilast, etanercept, infliximab, methotrexate, and ustekinumab. Users of acitretin, apremilast, infliximab, and methotrexate were older and had higher baseline comorbidity scores than subcutaneous biologic users (adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab).

Overall, the serious infection incidence rates were low, ranging from 1.1-1.3/100 Pt-yrs in the Marketscan database to 1.4-1.4/100 Pt-yrs in the Optum database. 

Pooled analyses compared the (SIE) rates for each cohort compared to those taking methotrexate and found the following SIE rates (expressed as hazard ratio [HR]; and 95% confidence intervals):

  • apremilast HR=0.50; 0.26-0.94
  • Etanercept HR=0.75; 0.61-0.93
  • Ustekinumab HR=0.65; 0.47-0.89
  • NO difference in SIE for acitretin, adalimumab, infliximab compared with methotrexate
  • Acetretin showed a a significantly increased risk of cellulitis (HR=1.76; 1.11-2.80)

Psoriasis patients have a relatively low risk of SIE with the use of current therapies, with a small but signicant advantage for apremilast, etanercept, and ustekinumab treated psoriasis patients.

The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject

Add new comment

More Like This

Bimekizumab Effective in Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Interleukin 17 IIL-17) is important in the pathogenesis of psoriatic disease, with most current approaches targeting IL-17A. Now there is a noveal approach showing that dual neutralisation of IL-17A and IL-17F in psoriatic arthritis arthritis patients results in clinically significant improvement.

Upadacitinib Effective in Phase 3 Psoriatic Arthritis Study

Abbvie has announced top line results of their SELECT-PSA trial of upadacitinib (UPA), wherein both the 15 and 30 mg doses met the primary endpoint of ACR20 response at week 12 and demonstrated radiographic inhibition at week 24.

Which Biologics are Best in Psoriasis

A metanalysis of phase II, III and IV trials in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis suggests comparative efficacy biologic treatments, but that that brodalumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, and risankizumab-rzaa were shown to have the past skin (PASI) response rates.

Taltz Shines in Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

Ixekizumab (IXE), an interleukin-17A (IL-17A) inhibitor, was recently approved for use in ankylosing spondylitis (also known as radiographic axial spondyloarthritis- axSpA). Lancet has published the results of the COAST-X study showing that ixekizumab was effective in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.

Best of 2019 - SEAM-PsA Study - Does Monotherapy MTX Win Despite Losing to Etanercept in Psoriatic Arthritis?

The SEAM-PsA study examined the efficacy of methotrexate monotherapy, etanercept monotherapy or the combination of MTX and ETN in psoriatic arthritis patients, and found that ETN monotherapy was equivalent to combination therapy - and that both were superior to MTX alone in clinical (ACR and MDA) and radiographic responses.