Friday, 21 Feb 2020

You are here

New Treatments in Axial SpA from #ACR2019

There were new developments in the treatment of axial Spondyloarthritis (AS) at ACR 2019. The first area is on the use of anti-IL17A drugs, secukinumab and ixekizumab in non-radiographic AS. The second area is the use of JAK-1 inhibitor Upadacitinib in radiographic AS. The third area is the use of dual anti-IL17A and 17F drug bimekizumab in radiographic. Finally, there were reports of the benefit of using anti-TNF (certolizumab) earlier in diagnosis to prevent radiographic progression. I will cover these topics here.

Up to now, the anti-IL17A agent secukinumab has been approved for use in radiographic AS. With earlier diagnosis, increasingly more patients that we see in clinic are in the non-radiographic (nr) AS phase. Anti-TNF drugs (eg. adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab, golimumab) have been shown to be effective in nr-AS. Having anti-IL17A will be useful in cases where anti-TNF has failed in nr-AS. In the PREVENT study (late breaking abstract L21), 555 nr-AS patients were recruited into this Phase 3 study. Patients received 150mg of Secukinumab loading or without loading dose against placebo in a 1:1:1 randomisation, followed by monthly injections. At 16 weeks, the primary endpoint of ASAS40 was met in 42% of Secukinumab treated patients against 29% in the placebo group. The high placebo response may have been due to the fact that about 90% of patients were anti-TNF naïve and had back pain for greater than 8 years. This could have possibly led to the higher expectation of a response from treatment in the placebo group. In the second study on another anti-IL17A, Ixekizumab, IXE (abstract 2729), the COAST-X study looked nr-AS patients with greater than 10 years of back pain. Patients were randomised 1:1:1 to Ixekizumab 80mg every 2 weeks, 4 weeks or to placebo. The primary endpoint was ASAS40 at weeks 16 and 52. At week 16, the response of placebo, IXE 2 weekly and IXE 4 weekly was 19%, 40%, 35% respectively. At week 52, ASAS 40 was 13%, 31%, 30% in the 3 respective groups. In both studies there were no new safety signals beyond what is already known from other studies. Both these studies add to the treatment options for nr-AS and anti-IL-17A are effective in this condition. 

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have now been used and studied in AS. In abstract #2728, updacitinib (UPA) 15mg was compared to placebo (PBO). 187 patients were assigned 1:1 to UPA or PBO. At Week 14, more patients achieved ASAS40 in the UPA group (51.6%) versus placebo (25.5%). There were no new safety signals in the UPA group compared to previous studies of this drug.

Dual inhibition of IL-17 A and F with bimekizumab in AS was studied up to week 48 in abstract #0937. 303 patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to subcutaneous (sc) bimekizumab 16 mg, 64 mg, 160 mg, 320 mg, or placebo every 4 weeks. At Week 12, significantly more bimekizumab-treated pts vs placebo achieved ASAS40 (16 mg 29.5%; 64 mg 42.6%; 160 mg 46.7%; 320 mg 45.9%; placebo 13.3%; p< 0.05, all doses). ASAS40 response rates increased to Week 24 and were maintained to Week 48 (35.5–64.0%). Bimekizumab was generally well tolerated and no new or unexpected safety findings were identified.

The earlier use of anti-TNF in AS is supported by abstract #0936. Certolizumab (CZP) was used in patients with nr-AS in a phase 3 study, C-axSpAnd. 317 patients were randomised 1:1 to CZP versus PBO. Using a cut-off of 3 years symptom duration, responder rates for ASDAS-MI and ASAS40 were greater in CZP-treated pts with shorter symptom duration: at Wk 52, 56.4% (31/55) and 42.3% (44/104) of pts with < 3 and ≥ 3 years symptom duration achieved ASDAS-MI, respectively, while 65.5% (36/55) and 51.9% (54/104) achieved ASAS40. CZP-treated nr-axSpA pts with shorter symptom duration showed greater improvements across signs and symptoms of disease and in quality of life.

These abstracts from #ACR19 highlight three important take home messages for me, and these are

  1. There are new therapeutic modes of action beyond anti-TNF in AS. In nr-AS, IL-17A inhibitors and in r-AS, JAK inhibitors and IL-17A and F inhibitors provide new modes of action in AS.

  2. The primary outcome measure has been raised in studies from ASAS20 to ASAS40.

  3. Earlier treatment with Anti-TNF improves outcome measures.

I hope you will find this article helpful as you navigate the newer therapies in your clinics. 


Add new comment

More Like This

No Cancer Increase in Psoriatic Arthritis or with Biologics in Psoriasis

JAMA Dermatology reports that psoriasis is associated with a slightly increased risk of cancer, particularly keratinocyte cancer and lymphomas.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 112 studies including more than 2 million patients, also shows no increase in when psoriasis is treated with biologic agents, nor was psoriatic arthritis associated with an increased risk of cancer.   

Bimekizumab Effective in Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Interleukin 17 IIL-17) is important in the pathogenesis of psoriatic disease, with most current approaches targeting IL-17A. Now there is a noveal approach showing that dual neutralisation of IL-17A and IL-17F in psoriatic arthritis arthritis patients results in clinically significant improvement.

Upadacitinib Effective in Phase 3 Psoriatic Arthritis Study

Abbvie has announced top line results of their SELECT-PSA trial of upadacitinib (UPA), wherein both the 15 and 30 mg doses met the primary endpoint of ACR20 response at week 12 and demonstrated radiographic inhibition at week 24.

Which Biologics are Best in Psoriasis

A metanalysis of phase II, III and IV trials in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis suggests comparative efficacy biologic treatments, but that that brodalumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, and risankizumab-rzaa were shown to have the past skin (PASI) response rates.

Taltz Shines in Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

Ixekizumab (IXE), an interleukin-17A (IL-17A) inhibitor, was recently approved for use in ankylosing spondylitis (also known as radiographic axial spondyloarthritis- axSpA). Lancet has published the results of the COAST-X study showing that ixekizumab was effective in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.