Thursday, 19 Sep 2019

You are here

No Difference Among Biologics in Arthroplasty Infectious Risk

A large administrative claims analysis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients undergoing arthroplasty has shown no difference among biologics with regard to the risk of infections, but corticosteroid use was associated with a dose dependent risk of infection. 

The Annals of Internal Medicine has published an analysis of peri- and postoperative infectious risk among RA patients receiving biologics or glucocorticoids.

This was a retrospective cohort study using Medicare and Truven MarketScan administrative data from January 2006 to September 2015.

They included adult RA patients who were having elective inpatient total knee or hip arthroplasty, either primary or revision, in the setting of a recent infusion of or prescription for abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab, or tocilizumab before surgery. They sought to identify hospitalized infections within 30 days and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) within 1 year after arthroplasty.

A total of 9911 biologic treated patients, with 10,923 surgical procedures, were examined. Outcomes were similar despite the variety of biologics used. Hospitalized infection ranged from 6.87% risk with adalimumab to 8.9% with rituximab.

The 1-year cumulative incidence of prosthetic joint infection ranged from 0.35% with rituximab to 3.67% with tocilizumab.

Glucocorticoid use was associated with a dose-dependent increase in postoperative risk for all outcomes. When comparing more than 10 mg of glucocorticoids per day (vs. no glucocorticoid use) the predicted risks were:

  • Hospitalized infection: 13.25% vs. 6.78%, respectively
  • 1-year risk of prosthetic joint infection: 3.83% vs. 2.09%.

There appears to be no difference in risk for hospitalized infection amongst the biologics studied; glucocorticoid use, especially above 10 mg/d, was associated with greater risk for infectious complications.

Disclosures: 
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject

Add new comment

More Like This

Anakinra Shows Benefits in Cytokine Storm

The interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist anakinra (Kineret) showed promise in critically ill children who develop the often-lethal condition known as secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH)/macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), a retrospective single-center study found.

 

Prior Authorizations Delay Care in Rheumatology

Physicians who believe their patients' health is negatively affected by insurers' demands for prior authorization, and the delays that often result, will find that opinion vindicated by a new study of rheumatology care: when permission had to be sought from insurers to provide intravenous drugs, average time to begin treatment was longer and patients had twice the corticosteroid exposure, a single-center analysis found.

Upadacitinib (RINVOQ) FDA Approved for Rheumatoid Arthritis

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Friday, August 16, approved AbbVie JAK1 inhibitor, Rinvoq (upadacitinib) for adults with  rheumatoid arthritis with moderately to severely active disease either not responding to, or intolerant of, methotrexate (MTX). 

Are Non-TNF Biologics Superior to TNF inhibitors?

Current ACR and EULAR guidelines list TNF-inhibitors (TNFi) abatacept, rituximab, and tocilizumab as being equally effective after methotrexate or as second line therapies when treating rheumatoid arthritis. An analysis from the Swedish Rheumatology Register shows that the non-TNFi biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), in particular tocilizumab and rituximab, are more effective than TNFi. 

FINCH2: Filgotinib in Biologic Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis

The FINCH2 study has shown that filgotinib, an oral once daily JAK 1 inhibitor, is highly effective in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who failed to respond to prior biologic therapy.