Friday, 23 Mar 2018

You are here

Responder Criteria for Nonpharmalogical Treatment of Fibromyalgia.

Because of the subjective nature of fibromyalgia symptoms, tools for monitoring of disease activity and/or treatment assessment tools to evaluate effectiveness of nonpharmacological modalities are difficult to develop.
Due to the great variation in symptomatology among fibromyalgia patients, both pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment for fibromyalgia are equally important while showing large individual variability in the long-term outcomes for fibromyalgia patients.

Responder criteria can help evaluate effectiveness of treatment and tailor to each individual patient, but no such criteria exists for nonpharmacological treatment per se.

Dr. Vervoort et al got on a mission to define responder criteria for multicomponent non-pharmacological treatment in FM.

In this project, candidate responder sets were identified in literature and tested for sensitivity and specificity in a cohort of 144 patients with FM receiving multicomponent non-pharmacological treatment. The therapist's judgement about patient's goal attainment and patients' perspective on health status change, assessed at 6 months after the start of treatment, were used as gold standard.

The groups defined 3 responder sets from the literature with the highest sensitivity and specificity. An additional 4 sets were formulated by expert group consensus: All responder criteria were defined and comprised combinations of domains of 1) pain; 2) fatigue; 3) patient global assessment (PGA); 4) illness perceptions; 5) limitations in activities of daily living (ADL); 6) sleep.

Of the literature-based responder sets, the OMERACT-OARSI responder set with patient's gold standard performed best (sensitivity 63%, specificity 75% and ROC area = 0.69). The expert-based responder set comprising the domains illness perceptions and limitations in ADL performed best (sensitivity 47%, specificity 96% and ROC area = 0.71).

Based on presented results, the group suggests further research should focus on the validation of those sets with acceptable performance.



Add new comment

More Like This

The RheumNow Week in Review - 23 March 2018

Dr. Jack Cush reviews the highlights from the news, journals and major meetings. New announcements and approval from the FDA; novel associations between ANCA vasculitis and thyroid disease; flare rates after arthroplasty; and pregnancy outcomes for men and women.

MMWR: Arthritis Prevalence Increases and Varies Widely

MMWR reports that In 2015, the number of adults with arthritis continued to increase; with marked geographic variability in arthritis estimates with gaps in arthritis management.

The CDC estimates that physician-diagnosed arthritis affects 54 million of adults in the United States with an annual cost of approximately $300 billion annually.

The RheumNow Week in Review - 16 March 2018

Dr. Jack Cush reviews the highlights from the news, journals and major meetings. Bigtime rheumatologic lessons with tales from intestinal crypts, the friendly skies & the hips of hockey players. Also the microbiome and lupus, benefits of ENT findings with GPA and rare risk of opportunistic infections with biologics.

The RheumNow Week in Review - 9 March 2018

Dr. Jack Cush reviews highlights, news and recent research published this past week on This week's report includes news on new regulatory changes, new indication for tofacitinib, the rise and deficits of opioids and the benefits of fish and bariatric surgery.

ACR Responds to Association Health Plans Proposed Rule

In comments submitted today to the US Department of Labor in response to its Association Health Plans (AHP) proposed rule, the American College of Rheumatology urged Administration officials to protect essential health benefits and other consumer protections that make it possible for individuals living with rheumatic diseases to access comprehensive and affordable healthcare.