Friday, 15 Dec 2017

You are here

Responder Criteria for Nonpharmalogical Treatment of Fibromyalgia.

Because of the subjective nature of fibromyalgia symptoms, tools for monitoring of disease activity and/or treatment assessment tools to evaluate effectiveness of nonpharmacological modalities are difficult to develop.
Due to the great variation in symptomatology among fibromyalgia patients, both pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment for fibromyalgia are equally important while showing large individual variability in the long-term outcomes for fibromyalgia patients.

Responder criteria can help evaluate effectiveness of treatment and tailor to each individual patient, but no such criteria exists for nonpharmacological treatment per se.

Dr. Vervoort et al got on a mission to define responder criteria for multicomponent non-pharmacological treatment in FM.

In this project, candidate responder sets were identified in literature and tested for sensitivity and specificity in a cohort of 144 patients with FM receiving multicomponent non-pharmacological treatment. The therapist's judgement about patient's goal attainment and patients' perspective on health status change, assessed at 6 months after the start of treatment, were used as gold standard.

The groups defined 3 responder sets from the literature with the highest sensitivity and specificity. An additional 4 sets were formulated by expert group consensus: All responder criteria were defined and comprised combinations of domains of 1) pain; 2) fatigue; 3) patient global assessment (PGA); 4) illness perceptions; 5) limitations in activities of daily living (ADL); 6) sleep.

Of the literature-based responder sets, the OMERACT-OARSI responder set with patient's gold standard performed best (sensitivity 63%, specificity 75% and ROC area = 0.69). The expert-based responder set comprising the domains illness perceptions and limitations in ADL performed best (sensitivity 47%, specificity 96% and ROC area = 0.71).

Based on presented results, the group suggests further research should focus on the validation of those sets with acceptable performance.

 

 



Add new comment

More Like This

The RheumNow Week in Review - 8 December 2017

Dr. Jack Cush covers the news and journal articles published on RheumNow.comin the past week.

Rheumatology Year in Review

During 2017, the improvements and refinements seen during previous years in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis have been extending to other conditions ranging from psoriatic arthritis to lupus and for both monoclonal antibodies and oral small molecule medications.

Advances for Biologics

The ACR17 RheumNow Week in Review - 1 December 2017

Dr Jack Cush reviews nighlights and news from the past 2 weeks on RheumNow.com. This week's report includes new drug approvals, disappointing ACR guidelines, Lyme & Zika, infertility, dermatomyositis skin outcomes and myositis-associated cancer testing.

ACR Clinical Guidelines Flawed by Low Evidence

JAMA Internal Medicine has reported that recommendations and clinical practice guidelines from the American College of Rheumatology are often based on expert opinion, but lack rigorous (grade A) evidence to support many of their recommendations. 

RheumNow ACR 2017 Awards

The Annual Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology is a gargantuan educational and professional event that is on nearly everyone's radar each year. RheumNow had an expansive effort to cover this meeting and you can review the work of our faculty at ACR17.RheumNow.com.  But we have decided to take this one step further and today we are announcing our 2017 RheumNow ACR Awards.