Friday, 17 Nov 2017

You are here

Rheumatologists are Slow to Change DMARDs

The paradigm of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy mandates early diagnosis and aggressive treatment.  Yet a recent cohort study has shown that RA patients with moderate to high disease activity (MHDAS) were met with infrequent DMARD adjustments; with median time to DMARD adjustment being 5 months and median time to low disease activity (LDAS) was roughly 10 months. 

Using a prospective RA cohort from the University of Pittsburg (RACER), researchers studied 538 RA patients (with 943.5 patient-years of follow-up) the found that patients in MHDAS had the following delays in DMARD adjustments:

  • 90 days: 60% of MHDAS had their DMARDs changed by 90 days
  • 154 days: Median time to adjust DMARDs in MHDAS patients
  • 301 days: Median time to achieve LDAS in MHDAS patients

Longer delays in DMARD adjustment were more likely in the elderly, lower baseline disease activity scores, longer duration of RA, and those on biologics.

Longer times to achieve LDAS was more likely in African-Americans, those with higher baseline disease activity or those not adjusting DMARD therapy within 90 days.

Such findings are not new or novel as other registries and observational cohorts have also shown therapeutic hesitancy amongst rheumatologists. Harrison et al studied 9873 RA patients in the RADIUS database. Despite having moderate activity (> 5 TJC/SJC), the percentage with no DMARD change was 67% at 6 mos., 48% at 12 mos. and 38% at 18 mos. More than half of patients (54%) did not achieve Pain VAS < 3/10 (https://buff.ly/2yx9A4d). Another prospective RA cohort study of 568 RA patients showed that 377 had severe disease and DMARD changes were variably and slowly made at 3 mos. (44%), 6 mos. (50%) or 12 mos. (68%). (https://buff.ly/2x8yt4Y)

The timeliness of DMARD adjustments in RA is a major unmet need for which many factors need to be addressed. These include the use of adjunctive therapies, treat-to-target metrics, access to care, frequency of patient evaluations and the current lack of time limits on therapeutic decision-making. 

 

Disclosures: 
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject

Add new comment

More Like This

ACR 2017 - Day 1 Highlights

Curtis and colleagues presented a plenary session that analyzed the duration of drug holidays and the risk of subsequent fractures (FX) in women starting bisphosphonates (BP). They looked at 156,236 women taking BP for 3 years (median 2.1 yrs.) and then discontinuing BP.  20% stopped BP for > 6 mos. and 12.7% restarted BP and 11% died. For those off BP for >2 yrs. there was a 40% increased risk of Hip Fx.

The Greatest Rheumatologist - Part I

Who is the greatest rheumatologist? What makes for a great rheum? Is it clinical acumen, scientific achievement, educational prowess or years of unrivaled service or mentoring? Rheumatologists are quite opinionated on this subject and very nostalgic about their mentors and leaders. When I’ve posed this question in small groups, it’s plain to see how moved they become when discussing mentors or peers who influenced them. Thus, I posed this question to many of our leaders and mentors: who do you think of as the greatest rheumatologist?

Top 16 Drugs in Rheumatology 2016

Using data compiled from annual reports, SEC filings, press releases, company websites, recently released sales figures show that in 2016, 11 of the top 16 rheumatology drugs demonstrated blockbuster sales (>$1 billion per annum).  Highlights from this report include:

Novel Gel Drug Delivery Developed for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Scientists at the Institute for Basic Science have invented a hydrogel capable of delivering drug at sites of inflammation in disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis. Published in Advanced Materials, this jelly-like material could be used to absorb extra fluids in swelling joints and release drugs wherever nitric oxide is produced in abundance.

2016 EULAR Guidelines on RA Management

The management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved significantly with time.  Nevertheless, there are still some uncertainties - such as when, what and which biologic or novel therapy should be used.