Friday, 19 Jan 2018

You are here

Rheumatologists are Slow to Change DMARDs

The paradigm of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy mandates early diagnosis and aggressive treatment.  Yet a recent cohort study has shown that RA patients with moderate to high disease activity (MHDAS) were met with infrequent DMARD adjustments; with median time to DMARD adjustment being 5 months and median time to low disease activity (LDAS) was roughly 10 months. 

Using a prospective RA cohort from the University of Pittsburg (RACER), researchers studied 538 RA patients (with 943.5 patient-years of follow-up) the found that patients in MHDAS had the following delays in DMARD adjustments:

  • 90 days: 60% of MHDAS had their DMARDs changed by 90 days
  • 154 days: Median time to adjust DMARDs in MHDAS patients
  • 301 days: Median time to achieve LDAS in MHDAS patients

Longer delays in DMARD adjustment were more likely in the elderly, lower baseline disease activity scores, longer duration of RA, and those on biologics.

Longer times to achieve LDAS was more likely in African-Americans, those with higher baseline disease activity or those not adjusting DMARD therapy within 90 days.

Such findings are not new or novel as other registries and observational cohorts have also shown therapeutic hesitancy amongst rheumatologists. Harrison et al studied 9873 RA patients in the RADIUS database. Despite having moderate activity (> 5 TJC/SJC), the percentage with no DMARD change was 67% at 6 mos., 48% at 12 mos. and 38% at 18 mos. More than half of patients (54%) did not achieve Pain VAS < 3/10 (https://buff.ly/2yx9A4d). Another prospective RA cohort study of 568 RA patients showed that 377 had severe disease and DMARD changes were variably and slowly made at 3 mos. (44%), 6 mos. (50%) or 12 mos. (68%). (https://buff.ly/2x8yt4Y)

The timeliness of DMARD adjustments in RA is a major unmet need for which many factors need to be addressed. These include the use of adjunctive therapies, treat-to-target metrics, access to care, frequency of patient evaluations and the current lack of time limits on therapeutic decision-making. 

 

Disclosures: 
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject

Add new comment

More Like This

Laparoscopic Gastric Sleeve Compared to Bypass Bariatric Surgery

JAMA reports the results of a 5 year Finnish study comparing the results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and shows that gastric bypass yielded greater weight loss at 5 years, the difference was not statistically significant, in patients with morbid obesity. 

2018 Predictions for Rheumatology

MedPage Today Editors surveyed a few rheumatologists for their major news predictions in 2018. Read on for predictions regarding drug pricing, biosimilars, autoimmunity and checkpoint inhibitors, and thrombotic events and JAK inhibition.

PRECISION Subanalyses Question Aspirin Use

The PRECISION trial reported last year that celecoxib appears to be safer than the NSAIDs naproxen or ibuprofen in treating osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis patients who are at increased cardiovascular risk. New data suggests that adding aspirin may nullify this advantage, according to a study presented at the annual American Heart Association meeting and reported by Medscape.

Physician Visit Times Vary Worldwide

A metanalysis published in BMJ Open shows that for half of the world’s population, primary care doctor visits last less than five minutes and that the range is from 48 seconds in Bangladesh to 22.5 minutes in Sweden (US PCP visit averages at 20 minutes).

Surgical Decompression Ineffective for Subacromial Shoulder Pain

Lancet reports that a common surgical intervention, arthroscopic sub-acromial decompression is ineffective compared to arthroscopy or no surgery at all.