Monday, 18 Feb 2019

You are here

We Measure What we do in RA, But so What?

We are supposed to treat to a target (T2T) in RA. In other words, measure many components of the disease and its activity and calculate a score and if the patient is not in remission (or a low state if remission is not achievable) we are to make a treatment change. At EULAR 2018 a study of 1776 patients from the VA database showed again the notion that if a patient is in high disease activity, treatment changes are made only half the time (FRI0018). My response to this is that the measures are not reflecting active RA (i.e. scores driven by non-inflammatory pain, tender joints from OA), or the patient refuses to accept more treatment or the most likely is that the score is not being calculated (i.e. for billing reimbursement, the components are collected but scores are not calculated during the visit) as the physician doesn’t think the disease is active (enough) to warrant a treatment change. However, even more strangely, 15% who were in remission had dose increasing or a new drug started and 21 to 25% in low disease activity had increases in treatment. I can say that the disease activity instruments used in the study (DAS28, CDAI and RAPID3) had a ‘dose response’ meaning that the frequency of treatment increases was lowest in remission, and highest in high disease activity and there will never be 100% concordance with outcome measures and treatment changes in clinical practice. It is too bad we don’t have the HbA1C (glycated Hbg) equivalent of RA – one easy test reflecting recent disease activity that we could target.

 

Disclosures: 
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject

Add new comment

More Like This

No Added Benefit to MRI-Guided Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis

A treat-to-target (T2T) strategy to manage rheumatoid arthritis hinges on clinical metrics to optimize therapy. But investigators from Denmark have shown that using magnetic resonance imaging–guided T2T failed to improve disease activity remission rates or reduce radiographic progression.

Differing Effects of Smoking and HLA-DRB1 in Seropositive Rheumatoids

Analyses from the Swedish EIRA incident rheumatoid arthritis cohort study shows that smoking and HLA-DRB1 exert differential effects on serologically defined RA subsets - but that the strongest influence was seen in double positive (CCP+, RF+) individuals.

Update on Pregnancy Management in RA

Two recent reports offer good news to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) women who are planning to become pregnant. 

The first studies, RA women experiencing fertility issues who turn to assisted reproductive technology (ART) shows that live births were significantly lower in women with rheumatoid arthritis receiving ART treatment compared to usual rates in women without rheumatoid arthritis.

Multidisciplinary Recommendations for Rheumatoid Foot Problems

Approximately 90% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have foot problems. A multidisciplinary panel (including 2 patients, 22 professionals (rheumatologists, rehabilitation physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, specialized nurses, podiatrists, orthopaedic shoe technicians, pedicurists, researchers) in the Netherlands set out to develop recommendations for those who treat RA foot problems. 

Does Seropositivity Change with Therapy?

A subanalysis of the early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) "IMPROVED" study has shown that changes in RA-autoantibody levels are not associated with disease activity or or long-term drug response, but instead reflect intensity of immunosuppression. Thus while autoantibody levels may be modifiable by our best therapies, modifying CCP or RF levels appears to have limited clinical relevance.