Skip to main content

Novel Rx

      RT @Janetbirdope: So are we in an era of #monotherapy with bDMARDs in #PsA? Ustekinumab & Secukinumab not different
      3 years 1 month ago
      So are we in an era of #monotherapy with bDMARDs in #PsA? Ustekinumab & Secukinumab not different w or without #MTX. Abst#L12 @RheumNow #ACR21 https://t.co/Zp5owTpLvm
      RT @EBRheum: Important late breaker @TerrierBen, DBRCT of RTX vs GC (FFS=0) or CYC (FFS>0) for EGPA

      RTX not superior
      3 years 1 month ago
      Important late breaker @TerrierBen, DBRCT of RTX vs GC (FFS=0) or CYC (FFS>0) for EGPA RTX not superior to CYC (64% RTX vs 60% CYC BVAS remission d180, p = 0.745); similar in subgroups Feel like this lends support to (~surprising) ACR/VF recs for EGPA? #ACR21 #ACRAmbassador https://t.co/gpsPtXF6pj
      RT @ericdeinmd: #ACR21 L19: TitAIN: Secukinumab for GCA
      ⭐️Phase 2 study with n=52
      ⭐️70% of SEC sustained remissi
      3 years 1 month ago
      #ACR21 L19: TitAIN: Secukinumab for GCA ⭐️Phase 2 study with n=52 ⭐️70% of SEC sustained remission at wk 28 vs 20% PBO, 59% at week 52 vs 8% ⬇️Cumulative prednisolone through wk 52 (2.8g v 3.4g) - Looking forward to larger study @Rheumnow https://t.co/cuM9LcEr4u https://t.co/TmyS0kixFg
      RT @ericdeinmd: #ACR21 L21. REOVAS: RTX for EGPA
      ⭐️CYC traditionally preferred for 5-factor score>0
      ▶️Remissi
      3 years 1 month ago
      #ACR21 L21. REOVAS: RTX for EGPA ⭐️CYC traditionally preferred for 5-factor score>0 ▶️Remission rates and relapse-free survival comparable bw RTX and conventional. RTX not superior for induction ▶️No diff in ANCA+/-, naive v relapse, FFS https://t.co/cuM9LcEr4u @Rheumnow
      RT @uptoTate: Racial disparities & Co-morbidities in PsA findings. Amongst important others, increased biologic use
      3 years 1 month ago
      Racial disparities & Co-morbidities in PsA findings. Amongst important others, increased biologic use in Caucasians w/ PsA vs DMARDs in black PsA pts. View Abs 1780 for other relevant findings. #ACR21 #RheumNow #ACRbest @RheumNow https://t.co/0uKsa8i0bG https://t.co/R9YkxYqXws
      RT @uptoTate: RHEKISS registry: SpA pts on bDMARDs at conception are NOT at inc. risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Di
      3 years 1 month ago
      RHEKISS registry: SpA pts on bDMARDs at conception are NOT at inc. risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Discontinuation of bDMARDs after conception is assoc'd w/ inc. dz activity during/after pregnancy & flare risk. Abs 1730 #ACR21 #RheumNow @RheumNow https://t.co/b2wI9GZios https://t.co/wsuvv3hF0v
      RT @drdavidliew: b/tsDMARDs + tumor response in rheum irAEs

      Excellent point by @CCalabreseDO @LCalabreseDO:
      - despite p
      3 years 1 month ago
      b/tsDMARDs + tumor response in rheum irAEs Excellent point by @CCalabreseDO @LCalabreseDO: - despite progression in 5/10, DMARD contribution uncertain (bad cancer) - without DMARD, ICI would have had to stop crucial question, prospective study needed #ACR21 ABST1519 @RheumNow https://t.co/omJnTNVscH
      RT @RichardPAConway: Sub-analysis of ICHIBAN study looking at adverse events in tocilizumab treated patients with/withou
      3 years 1 month ago
      Sub-analysis of ICHIBAN study looking at adverse events in tocilizumab treated patients with/without steroids. Steroids associated with small increase in adverse events across board. Abstr#1693 #ACR21 @RheumNow https://t.co/ldiovirKpo
      RT @drdavidliew: For patients with inflammatory irAEs, what's your preference of bDMARD/tsDMARD?

      (keeping in mind both
      3 years 1 month ago
      For patients with inflammatory irAEs, what's your preference of bDMARD/tsDMARD? (keeping in mind both irAE response and tumor response) #ACR21 irAE Study Group run by @CCalabreseDO @NAbdelwahabMD @ReidMDMPH @RheumNow
      ×