Skip to main content

JAK/TYK2

      Abstract 1731 is a small RCT of baricitinib in inflammatory myositis comparing early start baricitinib to later start.
      Comparison of infection risk across b/tsDMARDs in IA in real-world study

      Treatment with
      ➡️Rituximab
      ➡️JAKi
      ➡?

      Mrinalini Dey DrMiniDey

      10 months 3 weeks ago
      Comparison of infection risk across b/tsDMARDs in IA in real-world study Treatment with ➡️Rituximab ➡️JAKi ➡️Anti-IL6 assoc with ⬆️⬆️ risk of severe infection compared to TNFi A reminder to consider comorbidities & infection risk in selecting b/tsDMARDs Ab1716 #ACR24 @RheumNow
      Interesting comparative effectivness study, TOFA vs calcineurin inhibitors in MDA5-dermato

      Expansion of prior publicati

      Mike Putman EBRheum

      10 months 3 weeks ago
      Interesting comparative effectivness study, TOFA vs calcineurin inhibitors in MDA5-dermato Expansion of prior publication @NEJM that used historical controls: https://t.co/AzA8ybCqYH Encouraging data for JAKs in this disease; need proper trials #ACR24 @RheumNow Abstr#1736 https://t.co/BHVMZLu6Ip
      Wu et al. MDA5-DM. Propensity-score cohort study. 672 patients. Tofacitinib vs CNI. Primary outcome 1 year death or lung

      Richard Conway RichardPAConway

      10 months 3 weeks ago
      Wu et al. MDA5-DM. Propensity-score cohort study. 672 patients. Tofacitinib vs CNI. Primary outcome 1 year death or lung transplant. HR 0.70 favouring tofacitinib. @RheumNow #ACR24 Abstr#1736 https://t.co/A0aHhp1q9c https://t.co/LbutJDBllr
      JAKi Studies at ACR
      Chinoy et al. Baricitinib in IIM. Delayed-start clinical trial. 15 patients. 14/15 improved at 24 weeks (the other withd

      Richard Conway RichardPAConway

      10 months 3 weeks ago
      Chinoy et al. Baricitinib in IIM. Delayed-start clinical trial. 15 patients. 14/15 improved at 24 weeks (the other withdrew). 50% vs 100% at week 12 (delayed start group initiation). Stats confuse me a bit here but promising. @RheumNow #ACR24 Abstr#1731 https://t.co/orewsxbPpL https://t.co/5AyRpYJdec
      #Upadacitinib rises ‘ Up’ in all subgroups of #GCA Subset of overall #RCT of #rinvoq w more reduction of #steroids

      Janet Pope Janetbirdope

      10 months 3 weeks ago

      #Upadacitinib rises ‘ Up’ in all subgroups of #GCA Subset of overall #RCT of #rinvoq w more reduction of #steroids vs placebo+ slower #prednisone taper Consistent results best in UPA 15 mg >UPA 7.5mg/d > #placebo #ACR24 #ACRBest @RheumNow @ACRheum abst#1695 https://t.co/dA7RkNmWFd

      Alright help me out here; this is pretty implausible, right?

      Why would be pts be 11% more adherent to UPA? What's the

      Mike Putman EBRheum

      10 months 3 weeks ago
      Alright help me out here; this is pretty implausible, right? Why would be pts be 11% more adherent to UPA? What's the bio-plausibility here? UPA 10% better than other JAKs? Could do a network meta analysis; betting this doens't replicate #ACR24 @RheumNow Abstr#1362 https://t.co/vpPq3vu9Wf
      No Increase in Cardiovascular Events with JAK Inhibitors in IBD Patients

      UMKC researchers have compared the use of JAK

      Dr. John Cush RheumNow

      10 months 3 weeks ago
      No Increase in Cardiovascular Events with JAK Inhibitors in IBD Patients UMKC researchers have compared the use of JAK inhibitors versus tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, but failed to see an increase in major adverse… https://t.co/IOzckJIfYf https://t.co/8S6FnffVLG
      TYK2/JAK1 in Dermato? Interesting pre-clinical study of brepocitinib... but we really just need clinical data

      Glad to

      Mike Putman EBRheum

      10 months 3 weeks ago
      TYK2/JAK1 in Dermato? Interesting pre-clinical study of brepocitinib... but we really just need clinical data Glad to see this is headed straight to a Phase 3! Hoping they allow IVIG: has been a problem with many/most/all? recent dermato studies #ACR24 @RheumNow Abstr#0882 https://t.co/KS8fTMBpPR
      In this large 🇦🇺 RA cohort, median time on treatment for upadacitinib was lot higher than other JAKi
      (28mo vs 17mo

      David Liew drdavidliew

      10 months 3 weeks ago
      In this large 🇦🇺 RA cohort, median time on treatment for upadacitinib was lot higher than other JAKi (28mo vs 17mo) Why? Patient selection, or a real difference between JAKi? Would really like more comparative effectiveness data between JAKi #ACR24 OPAL group ABST1370 @RheumNow https://t.co/OU2ayzqIc8
      Spicy network SRMA, 123pts w/JAK-TNF-PLBO

      TNF >> JAK w/respect to malignancy (expected) & better than PLBO (s

      Mike Putman EBRheum

      10 months 3 weeks ago
      Spicy network SRMA, 123pts w/JAK-TNF-PLBO TNF >> JAK w/respect to malignancy (expected) & better than PLBO (spicy!) JAK > PLBO for heme cancers (makes sense); no significant (but slight trend) toward PLBO > JAK for all cancer The debate continues #ACR24 @RheumNow Abstr#0989 https://t.co/tBnb02gyzF
      Which RA patients are at increased risk of JAKi adverse events? Does disease activity matter?

      in the upadacitinib ph3 t

      David Liew drdavidliew

      10 months 3 weeks ago
      Which RA patients are at increased risk of JAKi adverse events? Does disease activity matter? in the upadacitinib ph3 trials, high disease activity pts had more: serious infections HZ MACE VTE Active RA is a massive contributor to many AEs in JAKi pts #ACR24 ABST1393 @RheumNow https://t.co/DlFf9Sfbja
      ×