JAK/TYK2

TheDaoIndex KDAO2011
1 year 9 months ago
Who knew @FDA_Drug_Info presented #ACR23 posters?! I thought they just issue statements if there was information to be shared! Abst#1822 Bari and Toci use during the pandemic for #COVID19 did not show new safety signals. 1 case HBV reactivation with bari @RheumNow https://t.co/zd7TELsV2j


Eric Dein
1 year 9 months ago
TM83 #ACR23 @RheumNow
45yo M b/l sacroiliitis, Rx MTX -> ADA -> MTX + Tofa. No improv
Low Ca, & Phos, ALP 239. Nml Vit D, High PTH.
DEXA: Osteoporosis
FGF23 high
PET/CT showed soft tissue density in nasal septum, few cortical breaks
Dx: oncogenic osteomalacia 2/2 malignancy https://t.co/EOcYNtovBy


Bella Mehta bella_mehta
1 year 9 months ago
How do we treat #VEXAS - UBA1 mutation
Large multicenter cohort - 110 pts, 99% M
Confirms the benefit of JAKi and tocilizumab
Others not so much
@RheumNow #ACR23 #ACRBest
#abstL03 https://t.co/tRjO31IHiD


Mike Putman EBRheum
1 year 9 months ago
Interesting counterpoint to a tweet from a few days ago re:black box warning for JAKs
No change in utilization rates post black box... maybe people had already baked this into the cake by then?
@RheumNow #ACR23 Abstr 2142 https://t.co/K9cWbRSWV6


Md Yuzaiful Md Yusof
1 year 9 months ago
#ACR23 Late-Breaking Abstr#L09 In a crowded market, you’ve got to stand out. Phase 2 RCT of LNK01001, a highly selective JAK1-i in China: improvement in ACR 20,50,70 vs PBO at WK12. Those in PBO who didn’t meet ACR20 improved after receiving Tx. Very low infections @RheumNow https://t.co/ZbJFNHOtFT


Eric Dein
1 year 9 months ago
A#L09 #ACR23 @RheumNow
New JAK! LNK01001
Chinese pts with mod-severe RA, csDMARD failures
12mg/24mg/PBO: W12: ACR20 60/73/31%, ACR50 40/42/9, ACR70 12/21/2%
Stat signif diff reached at wk 1 for ACR20!
Improved DAS28, HAQ-DI
Wk24 ext: 91% remain in ACR 20
AEs: HLD noted https://t.co/RXOMzxGOTy


Richard Conway
1 year 9 months ago
Phase 2 RCT. Selective JAK1i LNK01001 in RA. 156 patients, 24 week (12 week PBO controlled). Abstr#L09 #ACR23 @RheumNow https://t.co/hHjL1yFH0H https://t.co/Qls4zRrRGH


Dr. Antoni Chan
1 year 9 months ago
Crude drug retention at 1 year was 65% for JAKi, significantly lower than for other modes of action (74%) and TNFi (77%). These results are driven by the severity of the disease of patients on JAKi compared to other MOA. Aymon R Abst#1692 #ACR23 @RheumNow https://t.co/LPDpWdjoLg https://t.co/Ztaz94omd9


Richard Conway
1 year 9 months ago
Sendaydiego et al. Comparative cancer safety b/tsDMARDs. 37,026 patient database cohort study. Compared to TNFi, RTX HR 2.2 (1.5, 3.3) ABA HR 1.7 (1.3-2.4), JAKi HR 1.3 (0.9-1.9). Abstr#1678 #ACR23 @RheumNow https://t.co/bTNtaNJrln https://t.co/qQBM2F2q8N


Aurelie Najm
1 year 9 months ago
Ritux (OR 2.2), ABA (OR 1.3), JAKi (OR 1.3) significantly increase risk of cancer vs. TNFi
Cohort of 37000+ RA pts starting bio/tsDMARDs (379 incident cancers)
True biologic effect or confounding by indication in a generally more comorbid population?
@RheumNow #ACR23 ABST1678 https://t.co/suj6mVBEC0


Md Yuzaiful Md Yusof
1 year 9 months ago
#ACR23 Abstr#0840 Could combined JAK1/Tyk2 fare better than Tofacitinib in D2T #RA? Phase 2 RCT showed impressive results; > %50 pts in the higher doses TLL-018 arms achieved ACR50 vs TOF (42%). TOF non-responders at WK12 who switched to TLL-018 improved too @RheumNow #ACRBest https://t.co/Yw6Pvb2PH8
