Quick curmudgeonly complaint WHY are we doing 316 week extensions? That's 292 weeks of $$$ data... for what? 1. Insuff
Tweet Content
Quick curmudgeonly complaint
WHY are we doing 316 week extensions? That's 292 weeks of $$$ data... for what?
1. Insufficient N to assess meaningful safety signals
2. Open label, no comparator
It's just a very very expensive observational study
@RheumNow #ACR23 Abstr1434 https://t.co/Thj1XjeAn1
Show on Archive Page
On
Display in Search Results
On
PDQ
Off