Skip to main content

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Dr. John Cush
@RheumNow
Exagen studies 192 established RA pts (383 controls) for Abs: CCP2, RF IgA, RF IgM, PAD4 (IgA, IgG). RA signif assoc w/ CCP2+ (OR 110), RF (>7), PAD4 (3.5-5.9). In CCP neg - only PAD4 IgG (2.87) & RF (2.2) assoc w/ RA, w/ only small Dx gain (ΔAUC 0.02–0.04). https://t.co/isf7aMf24O
Jiha Lee
@JihaRheum
Same molecule, different route, different persistence: golimumab IV persisted 4.44 yrs vs 2.07 for SC in biologic-naive RA (n=9,464, Korean claims). Is it the route, or differenntial out of pocket cost, or supervised dosing and better adherence? P#240 #APLAR26 @RheumNow
Dr. John Cush
@RheumNow
JAMA Uveitis review: Uveitis peaks at 20–50 yrs; 41–60% is anterior. ~40 linked to systemic disease (HLA-B27=axSpA). 1st exclude infection (TB, toxo, herpes). Anterior UV: topical steroids. Posterior/pan UV: DMARDs first (MTX remission 52%, MMF 71%); adalimumab if refractory https://t.co/xTlr5lrwUz

Mixed Drinks, Mixed Results (10.30.2026)

Jack Cush, MD

Dr. Cush reviews the news and journal reports from this past week on RheumNow. This week on the podcast: hopeful guidelines for PMR; certainty about good & bad beverages in gout; mixed results in Sjogren's; non-lupus drugs saves lupus lives; and big hips sink ships in psoriatic arthritis

Peter Nash
@drpnash
number of naive-like CAR-T infused associates with prolonged survival but highly variable APLAR Seoul 2026 #CAR-T #Rheum Now
Dr. John Cush
@RheumNow
JAMA Uveitis review: Uveitis peaks at 20–50 yrs; 41–60% is anterior. ~40 linked to systemic disease (HLA-B27=axSpA). 1st exclude infection (TB, toxo, herpes). Anterior UV: topical steroids. Posterior/pan UV: DMARDs first (MTX remission 52%, MMF 71%); adalimumab if refractory https://t.co/jQQGzhAm7c
Dr. John Cush
@RheumNow
Treat-to-Target has Excellent 10-Year Outcomes in RA Most patients with RA whose initial treatment used a stringent treat-to-target strategy in a clinical trial were in remission 10 years later, with only modest radiographic progression over that time, researchers said. https://t.co/aWQgQAsoSI
Dr. John Cush
@RheumNow
Cryptococcus is rare, but twice as likely with JAK inhibitors. Retrospective TriNetX analysis of RA pts (>30k/grp) starting JAKi vs TNFi; JAKi vs non-TNFi; & TNFi vs non-TNF. Crypto seen in <0.2% in all groups; but signif higher HR for JAKi (HR 2.2 & 2.15) https://t.co/1J4SjcqF8u
Dr. John Cush
@RheumNow
Joint Disease in SLE Reconsidered A new Frontiers in Immunology review from Ong, Wincup and colleagues, shows that lupus arthropathy is not a single uniform entity and it is biologically under-studied and clinically mismeasured, Moreover, the biology of lupus arthritis may https://t.co/M5m6TMZr3x

Double Trouble (10.23.2026)

Jack Cush, MD

Dr. Jack Cush reviews the journal articles and regulatory announcements from this past week on RheumNow, including: two crystals in one joint, twice the cryptococcus risk in JAKs; Myositis and Scleroderma; and Sjögren’s plus early damage = >> 2 fold risk lymphoma. Double trouble week

Treat-to-Target has Excellent 10-Year Outcomes in RA

MedPage Today

Most patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) whose initial treatment used a stringent treat-to-target strategy in a clinical trial were in remission 10 years later, with only modest radiographic progression over that time, researchers said.

Dr. John Cush
@RheumNow
Cryptococcus is rare, but twice as likely with JAK inhibitors. Retrospective TriNetX analysis of RA pts (>30k/grp) starting JAKi vs TNFi; JAKi vs non-TNFi; & TNFi vs non-TNF. Crypto seen in <0.2% in all groups; but signif higher HR for JAKi (HR 2.2 & 2.15) https://t.co/fJeKwDZABL
Dr. John Cush
@RheumNow
Polish study compared comorbidities #s in incident RA & PsA. RA pts were older at dx (61 vs 44 yrs) & may drive higher rates in RA. 23/3 comorbidities (74%) were signif more prevalent in RA, including HTN (18 v 12%), ischemic HD (11 v 6%), cerebrovascular dz (4 vs 2%) https://t.co/l0RW6bVVHd
Dr. John Cush
@RheumNow
No difference in MACE risk betw TNFi vs JAKi in 6174 RA pts. Korean claims data compared TNFi (n 5,152) vs JAKi (n 1,022) initiators. MACE risk was 4.1 & 3.6/1000PYs w/ TNFi vs JAKi, respectively. MACE risk did not differ significantly between JAKi and TNFi (adj HR 0.636; 0.283, https://t.co/035WSUQAhJ
×