It is a bit stunning to see you wade into social-political issues in this forum with your commentary on BLM. This foray suggests strongly that you too are from the ‘60s and maintain a consciousness beyond the day-to-day machinations of our profession. As your colleagues warned you, it is treacherous to cross-over into these topics without knowing audience perspectives. Perhaps there is a better place for this, but I admire your apparent conviction that all of us should be having these discussions with open minds, listening and trying to empathize with others’ lives and fears. Your equating BLM with RheumLM is interesting, if curious. Movement titles can indeed be self-defeating. For example, Black Lives Also Matter (BLAM) seems better to me, but would need some comparative marketing research. Defunding police? Probably most would rather see “Balanced Funding for Social, Psychiatric, and Order Functions in Security – BFSPOFS”. Good luck with that! My parallel would be that SLE, translated as the bloody red wolf, seems grossly off the mark, yet we continue to use is as if it is rational and scientific. Let us not miss the point by arguing about cockamamie titles.