All News
Playing it Safe with RA? JAK vs. TNF Debate
Reported safety signals, at odds with the efficacy of these medications, have left rheumatology clinicians in a difficult position when considering when during a patient’s treatment course and in which patients, specifically, JAKi should be used. Two abstracts from ACR convergence 2024 further contribute to our understanding of this potential risk profile.
Read ArticleORAL Surveillance - Is Statin Use the Problem/Solution?
The findings from ORAL Surveillance Study have been a dominant conversation at recent ACR Convergence, with the seminal findings and subsequent analyses a target of debate. Subsequent post-hoc analyses, follow-up studies, and claims data analyses have been used to further interpret the data, though a clear answer on safety is not certain. A study presented on Sunday reported on a new post-hoc analysis that provides new insights.
Read ArticleAddressing CV Risk in RA: Are we doing enough?
ORAL surveillance was a post-authorisation safety study of tofacitinib 5mg and 10mg versus TNF inhibitors, focusing on rates of adverse events, including MACE. A higher incidence of MACE was observed with the use of tofacitinib. Statins are recommended in patients with a history of atherosclerotic disease or 10 year predicted risk of MACE. But, how many patients with rheumatoid arthritis, at risk of MACE, are actually taking a statin?
Read ArticleACR 2024 - Day 2 Report
Plenary sessions began the day, followed by thousands on the abstract floor. Here are a few of my favorite presentations from day 2 at ACR 2024.
Read Article
Links:
Links:
Links:
Links:
Links:
Caoilfhionn Connolly CaoilfhionnMD ( View Tweet)
Caoilfhionn Connolly CaoilfhionnMD ( View Tweet)
Links:
Links:
Links:
Links:
Janet Pope Janetbirdope ( View Tweet)
Links:


