Skip to main content

Uncertain Long Term Efficacy in Trials of Knee Osteoarthritis

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 47 randomized clinical trials in knee osteoarthritis finds uncertainty around estimates of effect size for pain scores thereby casting uncertainty over the long-term efficacy of medications for knee osteoarthritis.

JAMA reports a network meta-analysis of 47 RCTs (lasting from 1-4 years), involving 22 037 patients; mostly 55-70 years, with knee osteoarthritis who are randomized to receive analgesics; antioxidants; bone-acting agents (e.g., bisphosphonates) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS); intra-articular injections (hyaluronic acid or corticosteroids), glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate; and newer agents such as cindunistat and sprifermin.

Decreases in pain were only evident with celecoxib (standardized mean difference [SMD], −0.18) and glucosamine sulfate (SMD, −0.29). For all other estimates, there was large uncertainty compared to placebo.

Associations with improvement in joint space narrowing were found for glucosamine sulfate (SMD, −0.42 [95% CrI, −0.65 to −0.19]), chondroitin sulfate (SMD, −0.20 [95% CrI, −0.31 to −0.07]), and strontium ranelate (SMD, −0.20 [95% CrI, −0.36 to −0.05]).

These analyses again underscore the lack of good clinical trial designs, outcome measures and outcomes for the most prevalent form of arthritis - osteoarthritis of the knee. 

ADD THE FIRST COMMENT

If you are a health practitioner, you may to comment.

Due to the nature of these comment forums, only health practitioners are allowed to comment at this time.

Disclosures
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject
×