Skip to main content

3 Months of Romosozumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

jjcush@gmail.com
Feb 23, 2026 6:51 pm
A report in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology suggested that 3 months of romosozumab (ROMO) followed by denosumab is as effective at increasing hip bone mineral density (BMD) as the standard 12-month course. 
 
ROMO, a sclerostin inhibitor, was FDA approved in 2019 for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high risk for fracture.  The duration of RMZ use is limited to 12 monthly doses, or a total of 1 year, after which anti-resorptive agent to prevent rebound loss of bone density.  This 12 month limit, noted in the product label, is because of a decline in anabolic benefits after 12 mos and concern over potential cardiovascular risk. 

This 12-month, prospective, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial of 50 postmenopausal (mean age 69 yrs) women (at high risk of fracture), treated women with either 3 months of ROMO (210 mg by subcutaneous injection, monthly) followed by 9 months of denosumab (60 mg by subcutaneous injection, every 6 months) or ROMO given monthly for 12 months. The primary endpoint was the percentage change in total hip BMD. The non-inferiority threshold was set at 2%. 
 
At 12 months both groups were equally effective with a mean 12-month change in total hip BMD of 5.7% vs 6%, in the 3 month ROMO vs 12 Mos. ROMO groups respectively. Hence, the abbreviated ROMO course met the prespecified non-inferiority threshold. 
Adverse events were equal between groups.
 
As ROMO has a 12 mos. use limit and is more costly, thie abbreviated course of ROMO followed by denosumab has advantages in cost, flexibility, possibly safety and offers the possibility of future 3 month courses after the first year. 
 

Join The Discussion

Jonathan M Greer

| Feb 24, 2026 8:35 am

How does this translate to vertebral density? More spine fractures occur in postmenopausal women than in the hip.

If you read the paper it says that the primary endpoint was total hip areal BMD assessed by DEXA. But Secondary endpoints were BMD of the femoral neck and lumbar spine . The non-inferiority threshold was set at 2%. - The BMD difference in the LS spine was 1.8% so this was also noninferior. But these are BMD results and not long term Fx results that you may be wanting. Its still encouraging.

Charles Pritchard

| Feb 25, 2026 6:36 pm

Not sure that measuring BMD at the end of 12 mos of Romo accurately reflects the true future bone density. Better is to wait after at least one antiresorptive treatment. There may be a mineralization delay which I have seen several times.

If you are a health practitioner, you may to comment.

Due to the nature of these comment forums, only health practitioners are allowed to comment at this time.

Disclosures
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject
×