Cost-Effectiveness of Biosimilars vs Leflunomide Save
An economic evaluation of 25 099 rheumatoid arthritis patients found that treatment with biosimilar disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were cost-effective compared with the conventional DMARD, leflunomide. Does this suggest RA treatment guidelines need to be amended to allow biosimilars use immediately after the failure of methotrexate?
From a total of 25 099 RA patients (mean age 56 years, 73% women), the lifetime health care cost and QALYs per treatment sequence initiated with:
- Leflunomide - US $154 632 and 14.82 QALYs
- Biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) - US $152 326 and 15.35 QALYs
- Biosimilar adalimumab (aBP-501) - US $145 419 and 15.55 QALYs
Both biosimilar choices presented lower costs and greater QALYs than the leflunomide choice. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (US$/QALY) comparing biosimilar infliximab sequence vs leflunomide sequence and biosimilar adalimumab sequence vs leflunomide sequence ranged from −15 797 to −8615 and −9088 to 10 238, respectively (all below the predefined willingness-to-pay threshold of US $48 555/QALY gain).
Treatment initiated with biosimilar DMARDs were cost-effective compared with leflunomide in managing RA patients not responding to an initial methotrexate treatment. Cost-effective biosimilars need not be reserved for late stage, 3rd or 4th line treatment in RA.
If you are a health practitioner, you may Login/Register to comment.
Due to the nature of these comment forums, only health practitioners are allowed to comment at this time.