Skip to main content

Synovial Tissue Signature Guiding Targeted IL-6 Therapy in RA

Feb 09, 2021 5:09 pm

RNA sequencing and classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) subsets has proven useful. RNA sequencing-based stratification of rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissue showed stronger associations with clinical responses compared with histopathological classification. Additionally, for patients with low or absent B-cell lineage expression signature in synovial tissue, tocilizumab is more effective than rituximab.

Prior studies have suggested that most therapies are ineffective in at least 40% of RA patients, and that 50% of RA patients have low or absent CD20 B cells, thereby questioning the rationale for using therapies such as rituximab (RTX).

The R4RA study was a 48-week, biopsy-driven, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 randomised controlled trial compared the clinical efficacy of tocilizumab vs. rituxi mab in patients RA patients who had an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF); but with treatment choices stratified by synovial B-cell status.

Patients were stratified according to baseline synovial biopsy with patients classified histologically as B-cell poor or rich. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either two 1000 mg rituximab infusions at an interval of 2 weeks (rituximab group) or 8 mg/kg tocilizumab infusions at 4-week intervals.

Baseline synovial biopsies from all participants were subjected to RNA sequencing and reclassified by B-cell molecular signature. The study was powered to test the superiority of tocilizumab over rituximab in the B-cell poor population at 16 weeks with a primary endpoint was defined as a 50% improvement in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI50%) from baseline.

A total of 164 RA patients were classified histologically and were randomly assigned to either RTX or TCZ.

In those histologically classified as B-cell poor, there was no statistically significant difference in CDAI50 responses in those treated with RTX (45%) or TCZ (56%) (p=0·31).

However, in those classified as B-cell poor with RNA sequencing, the TCZ group had a significantly greater CDAI50 response (63% vs. 36% in RTX; p=0·035).  Adverse events were the same between groups, as were serious adverse events (RTX 7% vs TCZ 10%). 

In this study, it appears that RNA sequencing-based treatment choices yielded superior outcomes compared to treatment based on synovial tissue histology.  The presence of a low or absent B-cell expression signature was associated with better tocilizumab oucomes (compared to rituximab).

 

Disclosures
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject

Add new comment

If you are a health practitioner, you may to comment.

Due to the nature of these comment forums, only health practitioners are allowed to comment at this time.

×