Skip to main content

TNF Inhibitors Reduce and Stabilize Coronary Plaque

Arthritis & Rheumatology reports that biologic (bDMARD) use in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may decrease cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk by retarding coronary plaque formation and progression (especially non‐calcified and low‐attenuation plaque).

RA patients have a higher rate of CV  events that is associated with chronic inflammation.

A single center cohort study of 150 RA patients who underwent computed tomography angiography to assess coronary atherosclerosis (total, non‐calcified, mixed/calcified and low‐attenuation plaque). Two-thirds of these patients had repeat CTA scans within 6.9±0.3 years to evaluate plaque progression. CV events included cardiac death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization, stroke, claudication, and heart failure hospitalization. (Results were adjusted for segment stenosis score, Framingham‐D'Agostino score and ‐CRP)

In this cohort, all patients were treated with DMARDs (80% methotrexate) and  88/146 (60.3%) were receiving bDMARDs at baseline, all of which were TNF inhibitors. 

Patients treated with bDMARD use associated with lower long‐term CVD risk (OR=0.15; 95%CI=0.04‐0.60]), especially in patients with non‐calcified plaque (OR=0.21; 95%CI=0.04‐0.99) or low‐attenuation plaque (OR=0.08; 95%CI=0.01‐0.70) at baseline.

While TNFi use protected against new plaque formation in patients without mixed/calcified plaque (OR=0.40; 95%CI=0.17‐0.93), TNFi did not protect those with calcified plaques. bDMARD treatment also predicted low‐attenuation plaque loss (p=0.042) (ie, plaque stabilization).

These imaging studies demonstrate how, and in whom, TNF inhibitor therapies may lower CVD events in RA patients. 

Join The Discussion

Gary Botstein

| Apr 27, 2020 2:09 pm

what happened to the 49 patients who had no f/u scans? How can you conclude benefit on bDMARDS if 1/3 of patients were not studied? Did these people die of CV dz?
Of the 45 patients without a follow-up scan two passed away, 6 relocated out of state and 37 declined the follow up scan. in terms of baseline characteristics, the 45 patients were on average older, had higher baseline tender joint counts, received greater number of concomitant csDMARDs and also had higher Framingham-D’Agostino risk scores. However, all these differences were no longer significant after adjusting for age. All patients (including the 45 without a repeat scan) were included in the CVD events analysis. All this information is clearly elaborated in the manuscript.

If you are a health practitioner, you may to comment.

Due to the nature of these comment forums, only health practitioners are allowed to comment at this time.

Disclosures
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject