BACHELOR Trial - Baricitinib in Early Polymyalgia Rheumatica Save
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7edcd/7edcdf983511d8f9cc5ce37c4d72188473135a06" alt=""
- 78% baricitinib group
- 13% placebo group (relative risk 5.8, adjusted p<0·0001)
Join The Discussion
I read this one time today and maybe I missed a lot but I have concerns....
If I am reading this right
GCs were optional ( you 'could" offer to IM injections and you could give GC for 'flair" [ uncertain what this means when all patients had active PMR at enrolment and all pts had active PMR ? and 1/2 were given placebo
I would not enroll if I had active PMR and I lack equipoise ( unless I missed something) to offer my patients such
Lastly - I think the PMR GC response is important diagnostically both when it works and especially when it doesn't
What can be said for Bari response??
Please rebut these comments perhaps my morning read missed the boat
LC - this was an odd trial that I published here because JAKi are just starting to be studied in both PMR and GCA. I agree with you this is a head scratcher, because:
- of the 39 enrolled only 34 were treated
- Yes, it looks like steroids were optional in this study where they state, "oral glucocorticoids as rescue treatment in the event of high disease activity" and that "Subdeltoid glucocorticoid injections at week 1 and week 4 were permitted" (not required)
- It looks like they were testing the concept of treating "early PMR" without steroids and with baricitinib. Success was disease control (but not remission) at week 12 without oral glucocorticoids.
I dont think this is a better way to treat PMR, I do think this says JAK inhibitors may be effective and should be studied
JC
If you are a health practitioner, you may Login/Register to comment.
Due to the nature of these comment forums, only health practitioners are allowed to comment at this time.