Skip to main content

Rituximab Efficacy in MAINRITSAN Long-Term Studies

The original randomized controlled, prospective MAINRITSAN study of 115 patients (87 with granulomatosis with polyangiitis, 23 with microscopic polyangiitis, and 5 with renal-limited ANCA-associated vasculitis [AAV]) demonstrated superiority of rituximab (RTX) over azathioprine (AZA) for maintenance of remission at 22 months in ANCA-associated vasculitis patients after CYC remission induction.

The long-term efficacy and safety of the MAINRITSAN  and MAINRITSAN2 study showed the 84-month remission rate to be higher with an 18-month fixed RTX regimen compared with AZA and 18-month tailored RTX.

The current study compared remission rates in systemic ANCA-associated Vasculitis (AAV) who achieve remission after cyclophosphamide induction and went on to receive:

  • 18-month fixed-schedule RTX versus AZA (MAINRITSAN)
  • 18-month fixed-schedule RTX versus 18-month tailored-RTX (MAINRITSAN2);
  • and extended therapy to 36 months with four additional RTX infusions after MAINRITSAN2 versus placebo (MAINRITSAN3).

Patients were then followed through month. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival at month 84. 

From a total of  277 AAV patients, prevention of major relapses at month 84 was best with the 18-month fixed-schedule RTX  (superior to AZA) (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.71). The

Maintenance of remission is higher in AAV patients who were treated with an 18-month fixed RTX regimen (compared with AZA or 18-month tailored RTX). 

ADD THE FIRST COMMENT

If you are a health practitioner, you may to comment.

Due to the nature of these comment forums, only health practitioners are allowed to comment at this time.

Disclosures
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this subject