van Vollenhoven’s Treatment Advances in Lupus Save
5 Key Takeaways
- Better Biomarkers in SLE should guide biologic choice. Belimumab favors serologically active disease (high dsDNA, low C3/C4). Anifrolumab may be best with IFN-signature positivity and excels in cutaneous disease.
- Glucocorticoid stewardship is now explicit. The chronic ceiling is ≤5 mg/day, with a goal of zero or NO steroids; using a treat-to-target framework that targets remission (DORIS) or LLDAS at 3–6-month intervals.
- The emerging SLE pipeline introduces new mechanisms and targets - TYK2, pDC/BDCA2, CD40L, S1P1, BAFF-R depletion, and JAK1 agents are all in Phase III. Oral options would add convenience. Head-to-head data will be lacking.
- CAR-T may potentially reset the therapeutic ceiling, but it is not yet a strategy and we still do not have any controlled randomized trial data. Drug-free remission appears more achievable. Conditioning, toxicity, cost, and inpatient burden will confine near-term use to refractory, organ-threatening disease.
- Endpoints and definitions are being rebuilt. TRM-SLE, DORIS+, and ENDORSED will shape both future trials and how “cure-like” outcomes are labeled and approved.
Professor van Vollenhoven has compiled a state-of-the-art review on lupus treatment advances – current and future. SLE management is entering an unprecedented phase. Four agents are now approved for lupus nephritis (voclosporin, belimumab, anifrolumab, obinutuzumab), seven or more are in late-stage development, and CD19-directed CAR-T therapies are in development with the hope of even better outcomes.
Current Armamentarium: Calibrated Expectations
- Glucocorticoids: the chronic ceiling is now ≤5 mg/day prednisone equivalent, with tapering to zero increasingly advocated. Pulse dosing is 1000 mg/day × 3 days; severe flares use 0.5–1.0 mg/kg/day; moderate flares use 15–20 mg/day.
- Hydroxychloroquine: remains foundational for all patients, but it is slow, modest in potency, and rarely sufficient alone.
- Belimumab is most effective in patients with high anti-dsDNA and low complement. It reduces flares, GC use, and damage, with full effect at 3–6 months.
- Anifrolumab has demonstrable efficacy only in IFN-signature–positive patients. It is especially effective for cutaneous disease, often within weeks. Zoster is the only clearly overrepresented infection. A subcutaneous formulation succeeded in Phase III.
- Rituximab failed both RCTs (LUNAR, EXPLORER) but remains widely used off label for refractory disease.
Lupus Nephritis
- MMF and Euro-Lupus cyclophosphamide (6 biweekly 500 mg infusions, then AZA/MMF maintenance) remain backbone induction regimens.
- Belimumab (BLISS-LN) and obinutuzumab add renal response. Obinutuzumab is given as 2 infusions repeated every 6 months.
- Voclosporin (AURORA 1) is effective without the hypertension seen with cyclosporine.
- Tacrolimus outperformed MMF in Asian trials.
Late-Stage Pipeline (Phase III)
| Agent | Mechanism | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Obinutuzumab | Anti-CD20 | SLE Phase III positive (press release, Nov 2025; no data released) |
| Dapirolizumab pegol | Fc-free anti-CD40L | PHOENYCS GO met primary and secondary endpoints; second Phase III and LN trial ongoing |
| Deucravacitinib | TYK2 | Robust Phase II; two Phase III ongoing |
| Litifilimab | Anti-BDCA2 (pDC) | Phase II positive in SLE and CLE; two Phase III ongoing |
| Ianalumab | Anti-BAFF-R, B-cell depleting | Phase II positive; two SLE and one LN Phase III ongoing; positive in Sjögren’s |
| Upadacitinib | JAK1 | Phase II positive; two Phase III ongoing |
| Cenerimod | S1P1 modulator | Phase II missed primary endpoint; Phase III ongoing |
| Anifrolumab (LN) | IFNAR | Phase II missed primary endpoint; Phase III ongoing |
| Telitacicept | TACI-Fc (BAFF + APRIL) | Approved in China (2021/2023); >80,000 patients treated; no Western SLE trials |
Dapirolizumab and cenerimod are notable because they add new mechanisms: T-cell costimulation blockade and lymphocyte trafficking.
Cellular Therapies
- The Erlangen CD19 CAR-T experience grew from 5 to 15 patients. It showed near-universal responses, with drug-free remissions lasting months to years.
- Repopulating B cells appear naïve and non-autoimmune.
- Persistent caveats:
- Confounding: the fludarabine/cyclophosphamide conditioning confounds attribution of benefit and carries fertility risk.
- Toxicity: CRS, ICANS, and ICAHS can occur.
- Logistics: inpatient stays of 1–3 weeks are standard.
- Unknowns: long-term risks are undefined, as is whether re-treatment is feasible.
- Emerging alternatives:
- Bispecific T-cell engagers (teclistamab case report in NEJM 2024), which require repeated rather than one-off dosing.
- Allogeneic “off-the-shelf” CAR-T.
- In vivo CAR-T generation.
- Antigen-specific CAAR-T.
- Treg-directed strategies, which are thus far disappointing.
Regulatory and Definitional Infrastructure
- TRM-SLE: a new trial endpoint intended to replace SRI and BICLA, which the author criticizes as complex and nonintuitive.
- DORIS+: a definition of deep, drug-free remission with immunologic quiescence.
- ENDORSED: a definition of severe lupus.
- Lupus ABC: a consortium working on the regulatory pathways that unblinded cell therapies will require.
Author’s Predictions
- By 2028: at least 3–4 new SLE approvals.
- In 3–5 years: tightly restricted CAR-T approval for multi-refractory or organ-threatening disease.
- By 2032: multiplied options, with care organized around autoimmunity rather than organ systems, and a shift toward pathophysiology-based nomenclature.
SLE therapeutics are shifting from broad immunosuppression to targeted, biomarker-informed, and potentially immune-resetting approaches. The near-term challenge for rheumatologists will be choosing among many options without comparative data.



If you are a health practitioner, you may Login/Register to comment.
Due to the nature of these comment forums, only health practitioners are allowed to comment at this time.